• notaviking@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I think a lot of people forget how before the war, but after the 2014 annexure, Ukraine begged to be able to buy western weapons, such as the javelin, because one random guy can take out a whole tank (great force multipliers against the russian bear). Great deterrent. But they were not approved because they fought giving arms for Ukraine would provoke and not deter, and that dialog and greater economic integration with Russia would be the solution.

    So the west miscalculated, luckily Russia as well and Kiev did not fall, but now Ukraine is in a war, and unlike previously where they could have put resources into acquiring western weapons, they now have to input their resources into fighting and defending their country.

    The EU and America have stepped up initially, like 90% of the pledges went straight back into the American economy, since the give Ukraine their old stock and manufacture replacement stock for themselves. EU is close to matching USAs total contributions and if you look at France and their economy’s size they are percentage wise out spending the US in contributions.

    The nice thing here is most support money gets spend in their own country, stimulating their economy, Ukraine is putting their own citizens and soldiers life on the line and it will weaken a common Nato foe. But not supporting Ukraine will emboldened Russia and now that most of their military ineptitude and corruption has been exposed and is being improved, Russia might calculate further expansion, since that is their modus operandi.

    • eardon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      giving arms for Ukraine would provoke and not deter

      This rationale is given time and time again for why we shouldn’t have supported Ukraine and every time it’s completely false.

      Hopefully people can learn from this history and not make the same mistakes in the past.

      Ukraine should’ve mined the shit out of their border with Russia.

      • notaviking@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Exactly, but hindsight is 20/20. What I wanted to show was that a lack of support for Ukraine was then a win for Russia. But even more so now, that a lack of full continuous support for Ukraine today is just another win for Russia.

  • MakePorkGreatAgain@lemmy.basedcount.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    why does America have to do everything? the EU will be far more negatively impacted if Russia wins (energy, food, trade in general) - why arent the EU member states doing more?

    • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Because America spent a lot of time trading security for political points. Nobody is interested in having given the points and now also have to do the security.

      In recent years EU countries have been growing their armies and relying less on America, but nobody is ready to fight Russia. If America actually started withdrawing its promises and overseas assets, europe would wake up; but america doesn’t want that.

      • ivy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        The US and our allies cannot produce weapons at a rate faster than Russia does with 10% of the budget. Increasing our military budget further is going to make our national security situation worse

    • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Mike Johnson is pushing to get Ukraine aid. It’s part of why mtg is trying to get him removed. So while there are other issues with him, this isn’t one of them

      • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        All Mike Johnson has to do is schedule an up or down vote on the Ukraine Aid bill that the Senate approved months ago. That’s it. He has failed to do even that.

          • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            If he does, it’ll be downvoted and fail. That’s what you want?

            I wanted him to do his job and put it up for a vote, where it just passed today with a supermajority in the House. Would have been so much simpler if he would have done this months ago.

  • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    As conservatives cheer. Conservatives did this. Your conservative neighbors, co-workers, family members and acquaintances… They all did this.

  • Harbinger01173430@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    We will receive the Ukrainian ladies with open arms into our countries. Once they decide to migrate, of course 🧐🧐🧐🐈