After his arguments failed to convince bylaw officers, Ruck took his case to court. Legal precedent supports naturalised gardening in Ontario, where in 1996 a court ruled that Sandy Bell, a Toronto gardener, had the right to express her environmental beliefs through gardening, overturning a fine issued to her under the city’s weeds and grass bylaw.

But Ruck, who represented himself, lost his case on procedural grounds after arguing that the city had applied the bylaw unfairly and arbitrarily. Now on the hook for the municipality’s legal bills of $6,000 (£3,450), he has filed an appeal.

Damn that sucks

deleted by creator

That’s the neat part, you don’t!

And you know he is only doing that because he 100% knows how Russia takes care of their wounded (they don’t).

Imagine how fucked all the Russians are going to be when they go back home to their 3rd world shithole. Let’s just hope they take it out on Putin.

The truck is not really washable. They will absolutely fuck it up cleaning that out. It can’t even resist rain.

So youve donated a bunch and now stopped? Right? Anakin?

Youd be surprised at how many think a raise gives them less

This answer literally means: nah not the part that is easily provable, I mean the part I made up and choose to believe without evidence.

It’s funny how little evidence you actually need to believe covid was a hoax, and the amount of evidence we have it isn’t. It’s almost like you’re part of a cult.

While Trump was saying this, he was vaccinated too. You got played

I can go through the dictionary all day. That’s called activism my dude, and it was an excellent way to being attention to a particular issue they are campaigning for.

The act is self-evident in regards to their purpose lmao. They “painted” the environment (polluted it) in a way we could all relate to, in a effort raise awareness on other things happening in the environment that aren’t as visible.

It’s called raising awareness in society. This kind of coverage costs millions of dollars, and it only happened because they involved something visible we all care for in a way.

Microsoft and Epic take less because they have less. Both their ecosystems are shit. They are also trying to get into the market, once they own a decent share of it they are hiking that right back up. Gaben is smart leaving it how it always has been, while continuously improving the platform.

People don’t like the 30%, but they are still choosing steam because it’s the better platform. Epic and co are the ones who make things exclusive and try to corner the market.

The article points to a “similar case with sony”, but it’s not similar really. Sony has exclusives too.

This entire article is shit and there’s no victim here, except Microsoft and Epic maybe. This is a class action lawsuit nobody asked for.

That’s the whole point. The CEOs dont care for their property either, there’s no point of vandalizing anything of theirs and ending up with lawsuits.

This message wasn’t to CEOs, it was to you.

I thought the headline was a bit misleading, because obviously environmental activists wouldn’t “paint” or vandalize something like that.

Anyone who thinks they are assholes for doing this to a monument should be thinking about what oil companies are doing to less visible areas that are just as important.

Just Stop Oil said the orange powder paint was cornflour and it would "wash away with rain

I didn’t say don’t use AI.

That’s completely besides the point.

Blizzard isn’t asking taxpayers to subsidize them billions “to advance humanity”.

As you say yourself, there are way better models than what is being funded right now, and what is likely to get the monopoly on energy, at our expense.

That’s cool and all, but we’re talking about the AI companies that are trying to get valuated at trillions of dollars and want taxpayers to pay for the upgrades to the grid. The sad part is it’s likely going to work

Usefulness is one thing, but it costs an astronomical amount of energy.

These companies are trying to make taxpayers pay for their infrastructure by pretending it’s to benefit everyone. It won’t benefit everyone that’s for sure.

Cats don’t drink milk

“oh no, we need all the tax payer money to sustain our super profitable business”.

“Ya ok”.