![](https://lemm.ee/pictrs/image/72487985-3f00-4c63-a691-97797c6f1177.webp)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
For example.
But honestly I was more joking. The thing that makes most projects useful is the developers developing it, and they can’t clone that
Creator of LULs (a script which helps links to point to your instance)
Come say hi here or over at https://twitch.tv/AzzuriteTV :) I like getting to know more people :)
Play games with me: https://steamcommunity.com/id/azzu
For example.
But honestly I was more joking. The thing that makes most projects useful is the developers developing it, and they can’t clone that
Not sure what you’re actually losing on YouTube though… You go fullscreen quickly anyway. And if I put two windows side by side I just disable the tab because I’m likely doing it for a reason to have two specific pages on them, actually giving more screenspace because I don’t have the bar at the top either.
Which website actually has a layout that makes use of your extra space, and doesn’t center the content with empty space on the left and right side? I actually have barely ever noticed a case where it was useful
They’re not supposed to, it’s just about blocking them from using the software :)
The real solution is to include a few tiananmenSquare
variables in all the repositories. Either they exclude the entire repository or just the specific file, in either case the entire project may be unusable.
I read the article, but I can’t make any sense of it. I think it just says there is anti-feminism in academia, without actually talking about what is exactly happening in academia that is anti-feminism. Extremely weird/useless.
I was not able to express myself clearly enough that you understand what I was talking about. Should I try again or do you not care?
With Proton, a large majority of games run on Linux, and most even better than on windows.
“Moderate” should not be a criterion for choosing anything. Rather you should choose the approach that has the best score when comparing reasons for and reasons against it, i.e. making a rational decision based on the available evidence.
The reason your “middle of the road” approach doesn’t make sense is because if you really decide like that, one side just has to get more and more extreme for you to “sympathize” with their side, since suddenly the middle will shift in their direction. You can be easily manipulated that way.
The question is, how many people spent as much time and gathered as much knowledge as you trying to break LLMs? If it’s not accessible to the majority, it might as well not exist.
Huh I thought I’ve been downloading stuff with ipfs from them the whole time
What would theoretically happen if they refused?
A repetition of the truth is always valuable. Not everyone fully understands how broken our society is. Even if just 0.1% read the comment and understand something new, it was valuable. Even if it’s just a reminder, it was valuable.
On the other hand, your comment is not valuable 100% of the time. Complaining about something generally true being there, which you could just ignore if you already know it, is absolutely useless. In fact, it’s even negative value, because if your complaint was followed and someone came to the thread without the knowledge, they’d be denied an opportunity to learn.
Are you a bot? This answer is so generic and not even addressing OP.
Any piracy costing money is also really really likely to be shut down relatively soon, making you need to change your setup.
Obviously you are completely alone in your fifties being single, everyone else is in happy relationships.
If the sarcasm wasn’t clear, it’s literally never too late.
Finally a diet that works!
God, I’m horrible
Honestly I can’t see why you’d choose average, non-wealthy. If you want quiet and peaceful, you’re sure to get it when wealthy, just pay for a large residence and security on the outskirts, then stay inside. Use disguises/body doubles when going out. Except for a little organizational overhead, which you can also pay people to do for you, you can have everything you want when you’re famous and wealthy.
I have no idea how selection works anywhere else, since I only ever used gimp.
For me, I don’t understand this meme, selection seems to work very intuitively, it seems to do what I expect it to do.
Also what no one has said yet, if you put two identical people next to each other, same mindset, same character, same visuals etc etc, but the one is wealthy and the other is poor, for 99% of people the wealthier one is more sexually attractive. Our brains view access to resources as a desirable quality.
And so, why would a rom com that is literally supposed to be about attractive people, make them purposefully less attractive? There’s basically no reason.