Do you think, maybe, the outlet has a slight bias here? Would you happen to have any other article with corroborating information?
The article points towards an “analyst” on telegram, but he’s just posting numbers without any insight into methodology or where he gets them from beyond being told the numbers.
No, it is a lot of obfuscation. Thats what they’ve been trying to get you to realise.
Oh no, it is truly terrible to hear that someone like you - A person whose rebuttal to a thought-out and sourced text is to call them names, like a child angry at the world for challenging their preconceived notions, thinks negatively of me. I do so try to endear me to idiotic assholes, so it really strikes a nerve that I have failed once again. Alas, some day I am sure I shall manage to do it. Perhaps if I regurgitate some trite joke or catchphrase from popular media instead of trying to think? Bazinga! Does that do anything for you?
lmao, good point
The words of someone who hasn’t studied a lick of American history
The words of someone who hasn’t studied enough
Thanks. I like to give the context of the other, but maybe i should actually just copy-paste the comment instead.
Oh, sorry, I assumed you were talking about presidential stuff due to the context of the meme.
Yeah, sure. They also ratfuck leftists in the other ones. The party is incapable of change.
No? Of course talking about politics is political. Try to quote the part you’re addressing.
Democrats no longer cover their ears at the sounds of protesters.
AIPAC money is a black mark.
People like you have to pretend to care.
I think you responded to the wrong comment? You paraphrasing does not seem to match up with anything I’ve written.
I didn’t know you could block yourself
I’d like to rudely point out that the last three primaries were either rigged or not held at all.
I think you’re wrong cuz this meme talks directly about politics. The original commenter said there was a community for that and this is not the place.
That has nothing at all to do with whether or not art is political.
While you can say anything is political, talking about the politics of your country is obviously more political than talking about a dog
Huh, odd, I almost feel like I touched on that?
It’s more overtly political
Neat! I did!
This community probably is for stuff less political
Which again is not related to whether or not art is political.
“I’m not hitting you!”
“But you are”
'“nuh uh, I just said I wasn’t and what I say is all that matters”
You have the mentality of a cartoon bully
Oh, so you just don’t understand what words mean.
The discussion was on wether or not the elections were obfuscated, which they are. You are now trying to move the goalposts on to a discussion of the merit of obfuscation, because you can’t make your brain work well enough to cede a point.