Way to water down what “terrorist” means

Keep spamming. I doubt it’ll lessen your chances.

?

Remember. They’re to obey their fathers. Who would be arranging marriages well before they reached marital age.

And then they’re married, they’re to obey their husbands. young girls were not making these decisions. Their parents were.

This didn’t really happen in Christendom.

There’s still no verse where Paul says to obey women in the same way that women are to obey men. I’m sorry. Husbands are to obey wives in the same way wives are to obey husbands.

Husbands don’t necessarily obey their wives in the same way. Husbands are given a greater task of “loving their wives as Christ loved The Church”

Ephesians 5:23-33

For the husband is the head of the wife even as Christ is the head of the church, his body, and is himself its Savior. Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit in everything to their husbands. Husbands, love your wives, as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her, that he might sanctify her, having cleansed her by the washing of water with the word, so that he might present the church to himself in splendor, without spot or wrinkle or any such thing, that she might be holy and without blemish. In the same way husbands should love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself. For no one ever hated his own flesh, but nourishes and cherishes it, just as Christ does the church, because we are members of his body. “Therefore a man shall leave his father and mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh.” This mystery is profound, and I am saying that it refers to Christ and the church. However, let each one of you love his wife as himself, and let the wife see that she respects her husband.

This definitely cannot be ignored, the implications of this command must be broken down.

Husbands are to serve their wives, not the other way around:

Mark 10:45

For even the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many.”

Husbands are to be willing to die for their wives. Not just in taking a bullet - that’s too easy - but dying to your own passions and desires everyday for the comfort of your wife - because you love her and do this out of love.

I should also emphasise the meaning of the word love here:

ἀγαπάω (agapos, verb for agape ἀγάπη)

This isn’t the same word as sexual love (eros). In fact, it’s basically exclusively used to describe the love that God has for us.

ἀγάπη is very sharply defined also:

1 Corinthians 13:1-13

If I speak in the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I am a noisy gong or a clanging cymbal. And if I have prophetic powers, and understand all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have all faith, so as to remove mountains, but have not love, I am nothing. If I give away all I have, and if I deliver up my body to be burned, but have not love, I gain nothing. Love is patient and kind; love does not envy or boast; it is not arrogant or rude. It does not insist on its own way; it is not irritable or resentful; it does not rejoice at wrongdoing, but rejoices with the truth. Love bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things. Love never ends. As for prophecies, they will pass away; as for tongues, they will cease; as for knowledge, it will pass away. For we know in part and we prophesy in part, but when the perfect comes, the partial will pass away. When I was a child, I spoke like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I gave up childish ways. For now we see in a mirror dimly, but then face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I have been fully known. So now faith, hope, and love abide, these three; but the greatest of these is love.

So it’s not the secular view of a patriarchal system, but a self-sacrificing Christlike husband whom the wife trusts and obeys.

He doesn’t tell women to submit to men, he tells wives to submit to their husbands. Both male and female children submit to their parents. Of course he doesn’t tell parents to submit to their children, that’s essentially lunacy.

Also there were very few women who were unmarried, culturally, at that time, the role of women were to mary and attend to their husband’s house and raise their children. No where does he contradict that.

Generally it’s traditionally believed that Mary Magdalene didn’t marry. Consecrated virgins (nuns) were also a thing

Paul defends the decision of women not to marry

1 Corinthians 7:8-9

To the unmarried and the widows I say that it is good for them to remain single, as I am. But if they cannot exercise self-control, they should marry. For it is better to marry than to burn with passion.

Yes, I do see that, but that’s within a marriage setting. Completely different to if a man she isn’t married to refuses to hire her as an accountant because she’s a woman.

In the way it is written, the commandment applies to both. “And the husband should not divorce his wife…” Is basically an abbreviation for the previous point, the note still applies. Essentially it’s like saying “the same applies for the husband”.

Jesus actually applied it to men:

Matthew 5:31-32

“It was also said, ‘Whoever divorces his wife, let him give her a certificate of divorce.’ But I say to you that everyone who divorces his wife, except on the ground of sexual immorality, makes her commit adultery, and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery.

And further on, His full teaching:

Matthew 19:3-9

And Pharisees came up to him and tested him by asking, “Is it lawful to divorce one’s wife for any cause?” He answered, “Have you not read that he who created them from the beginning made them male and female, and said, ‘Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’? So they are no longer two but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let not man separate.” They said to him, “Why then did Moses command one to give a certificate of divorce and to send her away?” He said to them, “Because of your hardness of heart Moses allowed you to divorce your wives, but from the beginning it was not so. And I say to you: whoever divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another, commits adultery.”

Two mature adults getting along? Kids are forced to have those parents and their siblings as well. Don’t see why husband and wife should be an exception

How do you measure justice?

Largely, because it assumes that every single person part of the religion is there voluntarily, which is demonstrably false.

If you’re vying for leadership, you are definitely there voluntarily.

Secondly, it DOES affect me. There is an active effort to erode the separation of church and state, meaning Christian values are being actively imposed on those who do not claim any affiliation with Christianity. Southern Baptist, being the largest denomination in the south, is increasingly active in politics.

That’s a separate issue - here it seems people want to impose secular values on the way the Southern Baptists do things. You can’t have it one way (In most cases, I do condemn the imposition of Christianity on the general secular public)

And lastly, I 100% agree that people within a religion should make absolutely no attempt to control the lives of those NOT within their religion. But that is not what we see.

I agree to a point. I think it is okay for Christians to be involved in politics, and a lot of those Christians would have their opinions and views originate from their philosophy which is rooted in Christianity. So these will be ideals that life is sacred, that the marginalised and oppressed should be uplifted, that people should be forgiven, etc. However, I wouldn’t see why things like adultery, polygamy, homosexuality, fornication or idolatry between consenting adults should be prohibited. If people want to be free to destroy themselves and make bad decisions, they have the right to do so as long as it isn’t harming others

Divorce is equally prohibited.

1 Corinthians 7:10-14

To the married I give this charge (not I, but the Lord): the wife should not separate from her husband (but if she does, she should remain unmarried or else be reconciled to her husband), and the husband should not divorce his wife. To the rest I say (I, not the Lord) that if any brother has a wife who is an unbeliever, and she consents to live with him, he should not divorce her. If any woman has a husband who is an unbeliever, and he consents to live with her, she should not divorce him. For the unbelieving husband is made holy because of his wife, and the unbelieving wife is made holy because of her husband. Otherwise your children would be unclean, but as it is, they are holy.

Paul goes out of his way to name both sexes.

Well, just say you did fall out of love or have an argument. For the sake of your children, you should remain together

That’s why you marry someone you love and enjoy being around. You commit yourself to them.

I’m not talking about indigenous religions here, I’m talking about Christianity. It forbids divorce equally whether it be a man or a woman who wishes to separate

Obey their husbands, yes. Doesn’t have much to do with secular job roles

There isn’t correlation between an ecclesial issue and secular issue. Christianity forbids women to hold authority over men within the church. However, this doesn’t have anything to do with secular politics, ie, a female prime minister/president doesn’t contradict this. You can have no issue with female political figures or women in other places within secular environments, but disagree with them being appointed in Church leadership.

Same can go for other issues such as same-sex marriage as well, adultery, premarital relations, etc.

I am not a part of your religion. So why should it affect me? The ecclesial structure of churches doesn’t affect you. If you want to form a religion where consenting converts are obliged to beat each other up and be beaten up and steal each others cars, why should I object

That’s what I said, before COVID. After that they decided not to bother anymore.

Although this is mainly western society pre-constantine. In places like Asia and the Arab world there was no advantage in pretending, quite the opposite. So it’s more pure there.

Extremely weird behaviour. Although that was the case until around before covid (in some places it’s still ongoing but it rapidly declines, churches led by atheists also rapidly die out)

If you’re talking about reform’s, both are vibes based.