![](https://discuss.tchncs.de/pictrs/image/aaeabf49-c3bf-46c7-953e-e7a2859f3b4d.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/80c24909-8a49-4cb6-9bdd-4b8621b8cf1d.jpeg)
That or live cd (well, most likely live usb nowadays)
Howdy! 👋
I’m level 27 web dev from 🇫🇮 Finland. Full stack developer by trade but more into server side and sysadmin stuff.
A furry or something. Why be yourself when you can be fluffy raccoon on the internet?
I’m also on Mastodon: @jakeRaccoon@mastodon.social
That or live cd (well, most likely live usb nowadays)
I was going to give the example of the Carnival cruise ship that sank in the 2010s (I think) largely due to the captain’s incompetence[…]
That’s Costa Concordia. It received extra media attention and is mostly known due to the awful behavior of the captain who first directly caused the accident and then fled the ship before most of his passengers.
Well, just by looking at responses in this thread, the controversy most definitely still exists. Some seem to like it and others hate it fiercely.
Cool, thanks for the explanation.
a single application that gets bundled with all necessary dependencies including versioning
Does that mean that if I were to install Application A and Application B that both have dependency to package C version 1.2.3 I then would have package C (and all of its possible sub dependencies) twice on my disk? I don’t know how much external dependencies applications on Linux usually have but doesn’t that have the potential to waste huge amounts of disk space?
Sorry to ask, I’m not really familiar with Linux desktop nowadays: I’ve seen Flatpak and Flathub talked about a lot lately and it seems to be kinda a controversial topic. Anyone wanna fill me in what’s all the noice about? It’s some kind of cross-distro “app store” thingy?
https://www.louhi.fi/domain-verkkotunnus/
Parikymppiä + alv / vuosi
5+ vuoden aikana hinta noussut kerran, mikä omasta mielestä ihan kohtuullista
Mulla on Louhella kaikki domainit ja ei oo ollut valittamista
Persujen kevätsiivous
Hieman amatöörimäiseltä vaikuttaa toiminta kun palvelun julkaisupäivä on ollut tiedossa pitkään, mutta ilmeisesti ei ole saatu sovellusta Googlen tarkastusprosessista ajoissa läpi.
Mutta eiköhän tästä hyvä tule, aikanaan
I think it would be useful with updates when setting up a new phone or after a factory reset when basically every app needs an update
My main issue with CVEs nowadays is that it seems one gets generated even when 99% of the use cases for the software in question are not vulnerable as the vulnerability requires a very specific configuration/circumstances/etc. to be exploitable. In large projects with lots of dependencies this adds a lot of noice and there’s a risk that actual important CVEs go unnoticed.