Lettuce eat lettuce

Always eat your greens!

  • 9 Posts
  • 507 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 12th, 2023

help-circle



  • Immutable distros are great for applications where you want uniformity for users and protections against users who are a little too curious for their own good.

    SteamOS is a perfect use case. You don’t want users easily running scripts on their Steam Decks to install god knows what and potentially wreck their systems, then come to Valve looking for a fix.

    Immutable distros solve that issue. Patches and updates for the OS roll out onto effectively identical systems, and if something does break, the update will fail instead of the system. So users will still have a fully functional Steam Deck.

    If you’re not very technical, or you aren’t a power user and packaged apps like Flatpaks are available for all your software, then go for it. I prefer to tinker under the hood with my computers, but I also understand and except the risk that creates.

    Immutable distros are a valuable part of a larger, vibrant Linux ecosystem IMO.






  • I’d give Nobara a try. I’ve been using it for about 2 years and it’s been pretty seamless. Already comes with a bunch of Linux gaming related software, like Steam, Lutris, Proton-up, etc.

    It also has a bunch of gaming performance patches automatically installed.

    If you’re not technically inclined at all and want a console style experience, Bazzite is probably your best bet.

    All that said, most mainstream distros will give you a fine gaming experience, you just might have to do some manual fiddling and installing yourself depending on the distro and the games you’re playing.






  • And yet, this AI expert stated that we don’t know why the AI designed the chip in specific ways. There’s a difference between understanding the rough mechanism for something, and understanding why something happened.

    Imagine hiring an engineer to design something, they hand you a finished design; they cannot explain what it is, how they actually designed it, how it works, or why they made the specific choices they did.

    I never made the false equivalency you claimed I did, and you also never addressed my second criticism, which is telling.