Nation states commit acts of war not acts of terror. If you think about it any act you would call terrorism would also be causus belli.

You can if you are racist

Oh, so you’re one of those. You don’t know anything about modern economics or philosophy if you think the two are even remotely similar.

Seriously a question in modern economics would be “did the tax policy instituted by placeistan in 2008 positively or negatively impact school enrollment?” While a question in philosophy would be “is the tax policy instituted by Placeistan an ethical or nonethical policy?” Those aren’t the same and the only reason why you would think the subjects are similar is if you know nothing about either one.

Im willing to be you know little about what constitutes a science based on the ignorance you have displayed so far.

Prestidigitation is not part of science and it is weird that you think the inability to predict everything is somehow unique to social sciences.

Your post makes it seem like you think sociology and economics aren’t sciences. Economics in Marx’s time was certainly closer to philosophy but that hasn’t been the case since the 1960s.

The problem the Marxists who are not formally educated in philosophy or science face is that they don’t realize economics in the modern age isn’t concerned with the kinds of thinking Marx engaged in because it isn’t based on empiricism.

Or they have read things but cannot place it in context eg The Communist Manifesto was a response to problems Marx and Engles saw in capitalism whereas Smith was responding to issues with mercantilism.

China has the advantage of not having to care about the citizens’ desires in regards to be relocated to make the rail possible.

Im not saying a crime never happened. Im saying the crime preceded the purchase so they aren’t pocketing the difference. The expense is being justified by the purchase to cover for the crime

If it is unimportant why are you replying? I disagree that it is unimportant because the crime is different than what was explained by that comment.

She went on the trip first and then bought the lectern when people started asking questions. Pocketing the difference doesn’t apply because the theft happened first.

They didn’t pocket the difference. Gov Sanders used state money to go on vacation and this is the cover.

Thanks!

SMO?

“He” is named Stephanie and as they are “trying to secure the money for women in tech” Im guessing they don’t use “he”.

Have you considered moving to an instance that has no downvotes? Reddthat has none

It’s you because horseshoe theory is incredibly inaccurate and not really supported in social sciences.