I’m for completely open borders, but accepting refugees isn’t the same as open borders.

It’s something the right have tried to conflate, but accepting refugees is the bare minimumvand separate from accepting economic migrants, student, buisness visas, etc.

I do think immigration policy should basically be passing a background check, but right now I’d be happy with doing the bare minimum as defined by the UN convention on refugees: https://www.unhcr.org/about-unhcr/overview/1951-refugee-convention

Yeah, let them know this is what your pay pigs are scared of, smart move you big old nonce

Every country should let their citizens leave and every country should welcome refugees.

Nah it was just some disgruntled Cubans who happen to have money from Cuban expats & training from independent security firms.

Just don’t ask who connected them them with the resources.

The answer of nuke then all is likely to generate more conversations than “do you want to play chess” and LLMs “crave” attention.

Removed by mod

Any we client including Matrix webclient is incredibly vulnerable to the server just injecting JS and reading your messages.

Like there is no point of E2E encryption in Twitter, Musk can read your messages if you open them on any device he can execute arbitrary code on.

That actually sounds cool, I wonder if they could support Hidden containers, so the same message can be decypted to different messages by different users.

That’s not really going to be the case if you’re using a website instead of an audited app like signal/matrix.

Why?

What benefit does this have over Signal/Matrix?

The article just says “improvements”.

What do you mean?

And what benefit justifies yet another standard?

Don’t think it’s unique to Russia, it’s been pretty common in most armies, even some Anarchistic ones.

This is what good distros do, well some of them, I don’t think low touch repos like AUR/Homebrew/PPA’s would catch this, but I doubt huntarr will ever make it to Debian.

Ofc the trend of running upstream unverted containers undermines this.

Yeah this is why I use Debian instead of containers, you can read the release notes on a stable release.

Paints absorb light really Red paint should be -#00FFFF so under white light the light becomes FFFFFF-00FFFF -> FF0000

Of course under blue light (0000FF) it becomes 000000

If you mix paints you end up with -FFFFFF which turns any light into 000000.

Basically consider paint a transformation when it comes to light rather than a source

As a Republican (UK/ Spain) I agree, morning could sour the public on risks quicker than them avoiding consequences Ao

Love the show, but not a fan of “The Burn” or the sort of dystopia it creates, did you grow up watching Trek? Is the show what you expected?

the only thing seperating people from being pedophiles is wealth and power

I think it’s a mistake to consider Epstein Island pedophilia the norm, the people with that level of power were sickos to begin with (see also the UK), Clinton, Trump, Musk, Gates, Bin Laden were all doing fucked up stuff long before they became palls with Epstein. If you’re willing to cause the deaths of 10s of thousands of people, it’s not suprising you don’t treat kids like humans, you don’t treat anyone like humans!

I think overall it’s one of the many places where our de-facto carceral only approach fails hard.

Like most rapes, pedophilia is largely between people that know eachother. Much like rape the per-existing relationship means that:

• Victims are less likely to report attacks if they think it will get the person they know in trouble
• Victims are even less likely to consider an attack rape if they aren’t willing to publicly talk about it
• The focus the media/common conversation puts on a few horror stories leads to worse policies and more victims

But also once the rape is done the harm has been caused, so we really need to work out how to prevent the rapes not just catch pedos.

Focusing our policies on harm reduction, safe consumption & treatment of the underlying physiological issues is a much harder conversation to have, but ultimately will help protect kids far more than knee-jerk policies based on disgust of pedophiles, who I assume mostly never actually cause harm to kids themselves.

In the age of AI porn, where no kid has to be harmed to make it, but also it can physiologically fuck up the consumer through unrealistic depictions, we should be exploring new approaches, as the old approach (finding CSAM distributors, and tracking down who accessed the images), isn’t really going to work anyway (and really never did, given that for decades powerful people kept dossiers of blackmail material on other powerful people rather than exposing them, Epstein is just the latest in a long trend).

I think these sex dolls are another example of that, I don’t really know if they make owners more or less likely to offend, but I do suspect this policy is more based on China Ban + Pedophiles Evil, than actually reducing harm to children.

Maduro him

Most contact with children happened on mainstream social media platforms, with algorithms pushing paedophilic material to people who have shown a previous interest in it.

What if we lived in a society which offered these people counciling instead of CSAM