More linguistic history.

The problem is GTP is learning from our existing knowledge base. If legislation is trying to amend a broken system, we don’t want AI to be modeling that system. This case seems fairly harmless, an AI takeover isn’t what we should be worries about.

Something like institutional racism being replicated in a more insidious manner is the concern. Relying on these closed systems potentially gives the type of people who implemented the discrimination being modeled to turn around and say, ‘See, we were right all along!’ If results are held up on a pedestal and AI is integrated into our political and legal systems, it may make changing society for the better much harder.

We shouldn’t universally condemn tools like ChatGTP being used in this way, but we should tread very carefully when it comes to large scale societal changes.

Removed by mod

That’s… not relevant to my point at all.

Make it apple employees in store and Microsoft forums. If humans give bad advice 10% of the time and Ai (or any technological replacement) makes mistakes 1% of the time, you can’t point to that 1% as a gotcha.

Grabbed my ol man’s winch and made a flying fox with his one.

Should Reddit or quora be liable if Google used a link instead? Ai doesn’t need to work 100% of the time. It just needs to be better than what we are using.

The ultimate question of philosophy…

“"Should I kill myself, or have a cup of coffee?”
-Camus

It’s like if 4chan and Quora had a baby.

Maybe it’s the system that’s broken not the individuals.

More likely there’s a bunch of data points it can use. Coming within BT range of someone who does have a cat for example. Otherwise all the major smart phone companies would need to be in collision to keep the secret because the battery drain would be so blatant of it was recording, processing, transfering etc.

It’s more of a vine, like spaghetti.