Our News Team @ 11 with host Snot Flickerman

  • 17 Posts
  • 644 Comments
Joined 8 months ago
cake
Cake day: October 24th, 2023

help-circle






  • provides more security than windows.

    Doubt.

    Yeah, if you have a fucking clue what you’re doing which most casual users don’t. (That includes me.)

    The only significant advantage it has security-wise over Windows is not defaulting to an admin/root account and instead requiring an elevation of privileges.

    …but even modern Windows does the same now.

    Exploits exist for Linux and other open source products, corporations with Linux servers and GNU utilities get hacked… I mean fuck just go look at all the CVE’s, they don’t make them for nothing.








  • Excellent comment.

    Do you know if the lawsuit that involved Sarah Silverman is going? Because I originally thought that one would have more legs, but maybe because the companies using the books3 corpus all dropped use of them, the case was dropped? I’m honestly unsure.

    It’s just that the fact that any of them used books3 to begin with should say everything. Everyone knew books3 was the entirety of private torrent tracker Bibliotik. It was not hidden. Bibliotik isn’t just regular old ebook piracy either, they distribute the tools to remove DRM from ebooks. So they’re using a corpus literally made from pirated ebooks that have potentially had their DRM stripped. I just seemed like a big, easy admission that they were more than happy to use unscrupulous methods to profit.

    As someone who was booted off of Bibliotik because it’s damn impossible to keep ratio there, it’s mind boggling to me that it wasn’t a bigger deal how widely used books3 was.





  • Is it that or is it that the laws are selectively applied on little guys and ignored once you make enough money? It certainly looks that way. Once you’ve achieved a level of “fuck you money” it doesn’t matter how unscrupulously you got there. I’m not sure letting the big guys get away with it while little guys still get fucked over is as big of a win as you think it is?


    Examples:

    The Pirate Bay: Only made enough money to run the site and keep the admins living a middle class lifestyle.

    VERDICT: Bad, wrong, and evil. Must be put in jail.

    OpenAI: Claims to be non-profit, then spins off for-profit wing. Makes a mint in a deal with Microsoft.

    VERDICT: Only the goodest of good people and we must allow them to continue doing so.


    The IP laws are stupid but letting fucking rich twats get away with it while regular people will still get fucked by the same rules is kind of a fucking stupid ass hill to die on.

    But sure, if we allow the giant companies to do it, SOMEHOW the same rules will “trickle down” to regular people. I think I’ve heard that story before… No, they only make exceptions for people who can basically print money. They’ll still fuck you and me six ways to Sunday for the same.

    I mean, the guys who ran Jetflicks, a pirate streaming site, are being hit with potentially 48 year sentences. Longer than a lot of way more serious fucking crimes. I’ve literally seen murderers get half that.

    But yeah, somehow, the same rules will end up being applied to us? My ass. They’re literally jailing people for it right now. If that wasn’t the case, maybe this argument would have legs.

    But AI companies? Totes okay, bro.




  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zonetoMemes@lemmy.mlCheckmate Valve
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    I was told to do it in exchange for money

    and most of the time neither do the business folk

    Allowing libraries to accrue over generations is something business folk keenly care about because it impacts profits over time.

    It’s literally why they have rules against transferring ownership.

    You can tell yourself it’s for other reasons, but you’d just be lying to yourself about Valve being more benevolent than they actually are. They actually are in it to make money. Being told to do it in exchange for money is pretty much why this will happen.

    Valve, at the end of the day, is still a company even if they’re marginally more consumer friendly than most. (Let’s not ignore that a lot of their “consumer friendly” decisions, like being able to return games, were literally because of laws saying they had to. They didn’t do it out of the “goodness of their hearts,” they did it because in some places they were being legally required to do so.)