Why do people down vote this comment? Is this info not correct?
Why do people down vote this comment? Is this info not correct?
This is a leading question. While I appreciate the sentiment, the question makes multiple assumptions and provides no reference/evidence. The question just wants to polarize the readers.
Not sure what “grow” means here exactly. But yes, the earth’s mass will increase.
This should be the top comment. Corporations should not be allowed to play the game of ‘let’s see how long we can get away with this’.
Hey all the best with your job hunt! I noticed few typos you may want to address : in the objective section - “SeptembER” , “waiter AT some moments” Stago experience - “taskED” , “AN understandable tool”
There are some weird phrasing too. Maybe a native speaker can help you out better!
( ͡° ͜ ͡°)
Is this expectation unreasonable? If consumers look for a monopolized service then won’t that service attempt to exploit the users? Just thinking out loud. I don’t know what the solution is.
I remember reading this during calculus. My basic understanding is that it is useful to explain conservation of a quantity. Can you explain the physical/ historical significance of this theorem?