It is part convience and part necessity. My entire infrastructure is currently x86 and introducing ARM into it seems like a hassle, if i develop and test software on my x86 based workstation i expect it to just work then, not having to deal with either compiling to ARM or using emulation. Also part of this that currently everything I use runs Arch, which only officially supports x86.

Which brings us to necessity, my software currently runs with manually written simd instructions. Ofcourse I can write ARM NEON polyfills for these, but again that takes a lot of work.

So while not impossible to use ARM it currently is a lot of work to use. I’m gonna save that time for when the big riscv migration comes.

Does anyone know of a European alternative for a x86 single board pc? I like the pi but it being ARM is a deal breaker for me.

Currently i use Lattepanda and they are great, so if something like that exists but European i would be very thankful.

The best and cheapest way to improve European rail is just have a single app/website that shows timetables and allows you to order tickets.

Based on Fedora, run by Red Hat, an American company.

Well you also need someone that manages the Azure, get them to do it.

I fully accept this is because of lack of experience but i find it easier to deploy to my own linux server then to azure.

I hope this brings some return to on-premise. Most businesses can fully operate with a cheap sever instead of sending it all to azure.

Unless op used grok to make this how is it “their” tool if you use an open source model?

Well if the EU gets nukes i would imagine there would be a clause that allows for a return strike wihout voting and only a first strike being banned completely or require voting.

Since there are only minutes to launch a return strike voting over it is completely pointless.

It would be best if there was an EU wide nuclear program. Not a nuclear sharing program but a nuclear program.

If this is impossible for whatever reason it is up to the member states to develop their own programs.

Russia would never have invaded if Ukraine kept their nukes.

But you can make this argument for anything that is used to make rich people richer. Even something as basic as pen and paper is used everyday to make rich people richer.

Why attack the technology if its the rich people you are against and not the technology itself.

No?

Anyone can run an AI even on the weakest hardware there are plenty of small open models for this.

Training an AI requires very strong hardware, however this is not an impossible hurdle as the models on hugging face show.

All the calculations could be done before hand and stored and then the only thing left in the delayed draw is to set the buffer.

I haven’t looked at the code yet so not sure how much if any it will save though.

Could also group pixels that are far away from eachother into a single call, while a compromise i think it will maintain the effect.

A random suggestion would be to draw to multiple canvases, and use a CSS animation for the delay.

Also not sure if you are already doing this but it might be more peformant to use the raw buffer instead of draw functions.

Alternatively you could look into webgpu, it is ment for these kind of things.

Here is the source (in dutch):

Het veranderen van de naam van het ministerie van Veiligheid en Justitie in Justitie en Veiligheid kost ruim 2 miljoen euro. Dat gaat onder meer op aan het aanpassen van de e-mailadressen van de medewerkers.

https://nos.nl/artikel/2278648-naamswijziging-ministeries-kost-32-miljoen-euro

Of the eight demonstrators who showed up in Amsterdam, five were Dutch and two were Russian. The identity of one remains unverified by the Kyiv Independent.

“Ukraine is evil for dutch taxpayers”

Ukraine might be the most efficient user of taxpayer money considering we spent 2 million euros renaming the “ministry of safety and justice” into “ministry of justice and safety”

Saying this as a dutch taxpayers im happy when it gets spend on helping Ukraine.

(Also propagandists like to think that when x amout of money is being send to Ukraine its train cars full of cash, when in fact its military equipment)

WE ARE SO BACK

Fair enough, it really depends on how you count. I grouped all variants under a single tank, if you count each variant differently then the number will be far greater indeed.

From what i can find T-80 is not in active service with any EU country and im really quite surprised M48’s are still used in active service.

What countries are included in “Europe”?

As far as i know there are currently 6 tanks in the EU in active service.

Leopard 2 (Germany) Leclerc (France) M1 Abrams (United States) K2 Black Panther (South Korea) T-72 (Soviet Union) C1 Ariete (Italy)

Good stuff, reaming by buying foreign equipment is only kicking the can down the line.

Investing into defense industry that can build new weapons is far stronger then temporarily buying weapons.