

I found this one as well: https://piefed.social/comment/10556273
Housemaids were hurrying homewards with their purchases for various Gallic breakfasts, and the long sticks of bread, a yard or two in length, carried under their arms, made an odd impression upon me.
– Louis Charles Elson (1898)


I found this one as well: https://piefed.social/comment/10556273


My issue is with censoring nudity, especially considering the topic of this community. There is nothing inherently sexual with our naked bodies, I think censoring only strengthens the idea of that it is.
I agree that we need to respect the original people of Australia (and other places for that matter), and acknowledge the atrocities committed towards them and the ongoing harm that results from it[1].
My belief is that an accompanying message, like they do (and are obliged to?) in Australia, to acknowledge the Aboriginals and Torres Straight Islanders, is more helpful than censoring parts of human beings.
Examples of such a message can be found here: https://aiatsis.gov.au/, and here: https://trove.nla.gov.au/ ↩︎


Ah okay! Well, the question remains, but I guess I am not going to find the answer :) Thanks for clarifying!
Maybe they’re from The Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies (AIATSIS) and/or from TROVE, many pictures there are restricted or not digitally available.


Why the US-style censorship on historic content?


This has nothing to do with military spending. I agree with your notion.
This has to do with the response of European countries towards different conflicts. Most European countries preach to respect international law when it favours them, while at other times they look away (Ukraine), often not to step on Trumps toes (Venezuela, Palestinian territories, Iran). You’re not a defender of inter’l law when you’re not consequent in applying/defending it.
All these conflicts are initiated illegally, however Europe (generally) has only responded with disgust when Russia attacked Ukraine (and, if you think about it, way too late (remember Georgia, Crimea, Eastern Ukraine)).


Ik vind dit artikel spot-on. Het is al jaren gaande, maar met de escalerende acties van Trump des te duidelijker dat Europese landen debet hebben aan het ondermijnen van het internationaal recht. In plaats van toe te kijken en zeggen, tsja dat was het internationaal recht, zouden Europese landen het moeten verdedigen.


We need a tofu emoji


And AirPods.
https://github.com/kavishdevar/librepods
I am an iPhone user too, but have been wanting to move to AOSP for while. All phones are so large now, so am using a mini. Hopefully Graphene works on a razr (flip) soon!


Die gebruikte ik voorheen ook wel, maar .ph, .today, .is etc zijn beheerd door de zelfde eigenaar (zie URLs in menuutje rechts). En net als Wikipedia vermijd ik het[1].
Uit de zelde Wiki-link: On 14 January 2026, it emerged that archive.today had inserted malicious JavaScript code in its CAPTCHA page to involve visitors in a DDoS attack against Gyrovague, and the archive.today blog posted public criticisms of Patokallio. Emails released by Patokallio show archive.today requesting the temporary removal of his report and later threatening him with AI pornography. On 20 February 2026, English Wikipedia editors banned links to archive.today due to the DDoS attack and evidence that archived content was tampered with to insert Patokallio’s name.) ↩︎


That introduction was not written by a communications officer, I guess. Or am I the only one who finds it aggressive in tone?


Giving in to the far-right will only lead to the nomalisation of dehumanising immigrants and asylum seekers. Maybe they should try reducing the wealth-gap instead of blaming a small group of vulnerable people.


They also take in consideration whether the chips can be produced with fairly paid labour (to a certain level). I believe they have once stated that this was an important reason not to use some chips.
I managed it! Add the line below to ‘My filters’:
www.theguardian.com##+js(trusted-set-cookie, X-GU-Experiment-0perc-D, true)


It annoys me when people say she is not as populist as feared, based on that she is supporting Ukraine and not anti-EU, while in Italy she is pushing hard against migrants, asylum seekers, and the LGBTQ+community.
Note that your link directs to the latest post. I think it is because of the /fap/. If that is removed it works fine. I think that’s a bit of a messy system that APOD uses.


I guess what he is talking about is that you linked the image (https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ image /2602/PIA20522enceladus .jpg ), but not the actual blog post (https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap260207.html (be sure not to include /fap/ in the link)) that include the textual information.
I am not sure if the image will show when adding the blog post as a link (instead of the image link), but when using the image link it is nice to add the blog post seperately. I think the blog post would be more valuable than the individual organisations underneath.
I commend you are adding sources! Thank you :)


deleted by creator
I’d rather support Environmental Party the Greens (MDG) who also support EU membership, but it is one of a few topics I can agree with Høyre (Norwegian People’s Party) on. Venstre (social liberals, confusingly named Left) and the Labour Party are generally also pro-EU.
According to this article voter support is 1) MDG, 2) Labour, 3) Venstre, 4) Høyre. This article is from last year, however. ‘Yes to EU’ is in minority again (51 against, 33 support).