Bun is not nearly popular enough to have a measurable impact on the JavaScript community, no matter what happens with it.

Isn’t that just a “how much do they yap” meter? A quiet person who lies can compulsively will have a lower number than a socially active person who tells occasional white lies.

Speaking is faster than typing, I guess?

It’s only a 2 hour window. I think very reasonable that you might play a game for 90 minutes and then at the end say “wait, that’s it‽ That’s not worth $x!”

Either Inuit or Yupik (or perhaps even Aleut), depending on which people you are intending to refer to.

Yes, absolutely. But how does an IQ test help with that? If someone has a low score, you then need to figure out what skill is lacking. That requires another test, no? How is assigning a point score helpful?

I don’t know of any education system that relies on IQ scores, yet they are usually set up to address shortcoming in skill or education. They do this via targeted tests and education programs. I don’t personally see what adding IQ would add.

Yes, but also something more. Something you definitely shouldn’t look up at work.

I’ve only heard the quote, never the attribution. I looked the quote up to attribute it, but I really don’t know who Stephen is. Hopefully not someone too horrible…?

“We judge ourselves by our intentions and others by their behaviour.”
― Stephen M.R. Covey

During pride month, you’re only allowed to be gay. Enforced by law, I’m pretty sure.

How are you going to give/sell it to the zoo if you cannot give it/sell it?

Depends on what your goal is. Winning? Not losing? Having fun? Personal growth? Depending on what you’re doing and what your circumstances are, you need to take different approaches.

To actually answer your question, neither action is inherently good or bad, and so neither ‘wins’. Attacking a child is bad, but defending a rapist is also bad. Reverse those positions, and suddenly they are good.

That’s roughly when the “subscribe to our newsletter” popup shows up. That darkens the background. You probably just have no foreground (if I may be so presumptuous as to guess).

Just like the real Google!

All the cool communists are out in the real world, robbing banks or something.

As a furry, the new Spyro is not more fuckable than the old one.

If you want a fuckable Spyro, look at this one.

Stereotypical “straight guy” clothes.

Within the context of the article, I think it is completely fair to say that creating code is cheap compared to the cost of understanding that code.

Depending on how you frame it, that happens all the time. For example, a speedbump causes speed reduction, but at high speeds it causes (momentary) loss of control. Or narrowing the road, which means less margin for error.

People will drive their cars as fast as feels safe. By introducing hazards, you make people slow down which increases safety, but each feature in isolation could be said to be dangerous in some way, y’know?

What a great parody of the thing that the link doesn’t say at all.