flamingos-cant

An interactive tragedy.

  • 432 Posts
  • 1.05K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle

  • Labour really went from repealing Section 28 to introducing a whole new one. How we’ve let this childish and anti-science notion that ‘biological sex’ is static become so pervasive is seriously depressing. Claiming someone’s ‘biological sex’ is only ever the same as the one they had at birth is like insisting an adult only weighs 4 KG.

    The Guardian in typical fashion quoted two trans hate groups who of course prefers the Tories even more anti-trans guidance.

    Then there’s this part, from section 68:

    Schools should ensure that they cover all the facts about sexual health, including STIs, in a way that is relevant for all pupils, including those who are lesbian, gay, bisexual and/or gender questioning.

    So a kid can’t be trans, only gender questioning. Thanks Labour, really committing to your manifesto pledge to 'protecting the freedom for people to explore their sexual orientation and gender identity".



  • Yeah, this an us thing, not a PieFed bug. We use this nginx bot blocker to help stop AI scrapers from ruining the server, and we have the following IP ranges blocked:

    # IP ranges
    47.82.0.0/17 1;
    47.79.0.0/17 1;
    47.251.94.6 1;
    2a03:4000::/31 1;
    2a0a:4cc0:2000::/48 1;
    2a0a:4cc0::/43 1;
    2a0a:4cc0:80::/43 1;
    
    # AT&T
    99.0.0.0/13 1;
    99.64.0.0/13 1;
    99.74.0.0/16 1;
    99.32.0.0/12 1;
    99.96.0.0/13 1;
    

    There’s also a whitelist-ips that lets us override the above, and I even had your instance in it with 2a03:4000:2a:305:24dd:dff:fe98:8ce6 1; # https://palaver.p3x.de/, but that 1 needs to be a zero. I’ve changed it so it should work now, sorry about that.




  • We’re hosted in Germany, but that doesn’t actually matter as the admins are physically in the UK so Ofcom fines are actually a worry. I need to do another review (yay), but I’m pretty sure we don’t have to do any age verification. We do have to assume all our users are children though, as we can only say we don’t if we do ‘highly effective age verification’* of our users, and we do host content that is ‘likely to appeal to children’, but I don’t believe we host anything that would need to be gatekept from children. We actively block NSFW content and as far as I’m aware there isn’t a suicide encouragement or terrorist recruitment community on Lemmy. There are maybe some things that I may need to be changed/patch in Lemmy (e.g. letting users lock their own posts), or making some safety tools (one I want to work on is doing perceptual hashing of images embedded in markdown as current tools only work on post links), but I don’t think complying is necessary an issue for us. I’m not a lawyer though and that’s just my understanding, we could be fucked.

    * This entire ‘force every website to keep a separate database of users adult status’ is so stupid and I swear it only works like this because of lobbying from companies like Yoti. PornHub is right that it should be device based, but these laws are only using children as a crutch. It’s implemented like this because certain parts of the British establishment find porn icky and are hoping by making it more invasive to access that you’ll stop watching it. Of course, all this is going to do is push people to sites that don’t follow the law so host more extreme content.






  • flamingos-cant@feddit.ukMtoUK Politics@feddit.ukThe hubris of Britain's new left
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    No paywall

    The event was a success; there will be more like it in Ilford and around the country. Britain has become a multi-party system and there is an appetite for a party (or perhaps just candidates) that talks about peace, Palestine and poverty. The launch of Sultana’s new party has been messy and the left beyond Labour is fragmented, with some elements filtering into the Greens and some likely preferring the more decentralised independent model.

    This seems unfair to Sultana, her party announcement focused a lot on inequality (two child cap, winter fuel payment, PIP). I get the left spends a lot of time talking about Gaza (justifiably, because genocide), but I don’t think that necessarily means a left election campaign will focus this much on foreign policy.

    Zack Polanski’s Green party leadership bid is probably close to what a left campaign would (or at least should) look like.














  • I imagine the low engagement is because everyone who uses it knows it’s a bot and treats it as read-only

    I don’t think this is the case, others like !Mirror@50501.chat and @free@rss.ponder.cat get engagement, and the latter doesn’t even post memes which most lemmings engage with with little regard to community or user.

    Is it actually causing any problems?

    See my other comment, but nothing technical.

    It’s pretty trivial to ignore/block it if you don’t want to see it. If it’s actually increasing our server bill or anything like that then it’s not worth keeping, but if it’s not causing any harm then why bother defederating?

    It is easy to block, but new lemmings aren’t going to know all the platform features.

    I’m not adamant about defeding though, if people are using it I’ll keep it around. There are other solutions to the issue of new users going to All, seeing a bunch of Reddit reports with no engagement and thinking the platform is dead. Like having new accounts block the bot by default.







  • It’s amazing that to gage if Corbyn supports Sultana’s party we have to read between the lines of an interview with ITV from a few days ago instead of Corbyn just stating he’s with the initiative.

    Either the reports are true, or this is a major comms failure on the yet-to-be-named party’s part. Having the initial talk of your new party being if the supposed co-founder is involved isn’t a good look. Corbyn has a lot to be rightfully mad at the media for, but this is one is on him.