![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://slrpnk.net/pictrs/image/7bd98db9-61cb-40f8-ae6e-0c7fe63012b6.webp)
Have you tried reading the actual lines?
Have you tried reading the actual lines?
Rule of thumb is, if something exists - there are some people who are made horny by it. Human sexuality is just wild.
That’s pretty funny considering I’m a Nordic socialist.
Funny indeed, but can happen to the best of us.
May well be but it’s not the case where I live. We have multiple literal neo-Nazis in parliament, courtesy of – drumroll please – a fucking conservative party
So in your opinion conservatism is not a valid political ideology? Or what is your conclusion. Since conservatives are part of our society and always will be and in a democracy we have to work with them.
You have a very US-American centrist view. European conservatives will sometimes be to the left of US-Democrats. Conservatism is relative to the society, it wants to generally preserve things how they are (again, very basic human experience if you ask me) - just happens that in the USA things rather suck for quite a lot of people.
Correlating political ideologies with psychological traits, especially with negative psychological traits. Progressives have been quite often on the other side of that argumentation (stereotyped as lazy hippies or naive tree hugers ). Stereotyping your opponent does not really help anyone since in a democracy we rely on compromise or conses.
I would be very cautious to use this argumentation line against your political opponents. To want things to stay the same, seems at least to me to be part of human experience and core of conservative ideology. While to condemn you political opponent through bio-determinism has not played out well in the past.
How inhumane should the system be? US-American conservatives - yes!
It’s where all the cool Greek philosophers are? Also since it’s roman - I assume some kind of orgies are involved.
Nah we would go to hades, much cooler place.
Somebody really passionate about it has to make one and not sell it or make it publicly tradable? Which would be difficult since the market is rather full (I would guess). Also dating can be just a miserable experience if one lacks self esteem and does not fit into societal expectations of desirability - that’s not on dating app problem.
Who ever started the whole enlightenment thing, with the idea that there is no god and we are responsible for our self.
The problem, like with a lot of stuff, ist that they are for profit and optimized in a way to maximize profit over the actual functionality.
Und wie ist das Ergebnis?
He has a point.
Ah, ok I get you now. That was more of a funny observation on the nature of our reality, where the definition of crazy are rather subjective and mostly used to discredit opponents. I think we saying very similar things, just in different ways.
I’m really curious how you interpret my statement, care to share? I lack to see any connection between your statement and mine.
Not sure what you are trying to express.
I like how not the folks who ignore or even facilitate climate catastrophe are the crazy one.
Nice that it’s done. Sad that it’s necessary at all and we still somehow have this conversation.
Some are and some aren’t. Like a lot of folks on here are here because reddit went to shit.