This is such a brazen conflict of interest that I’m not sure how they keep it clean short of refusing to have him call Raiders games.
Threat/abuse tracking, History/Geopolitics thonking, Misinfo/Grift fan, PDX based
openpgp4fpr:EC93911D412ACAE8779B8222588C793376B5F13C
This is such a brazen conflict of interest that I’m not sure how they keep it clean short of refusing to have him call Raiders games.
After sending off Derek Carr to watch him succeed under better leadership as well, only protecting Maxx Crosby from trade talks. But maybe you’re right and their true WR1… Jakobi Meyers will fill the void Davante left.
Interesting to watch the Raiders project stripped for parts but I think we knew that was coming once Derek Carr was tossed. They have a lot to figure out and it’s not the players.
The signing of him (especially the $1 first-year contract) is a pox upon the house of Browns. They knew what they were doing and did it. Now, we get to watch him refuse to play and they have to learn that his character failings extend to the field.
If I get to watch DeShaun Watson continue to get pummeled and fail, that’s a great day for me.
Such a strange feud. Aren’t there a bunch of WordPress hosts that are given usage of the software name? It sounds like there’s just something specifically about WPengine’s deployments that are changing the formula, creating a sticking point.
It’s cool to see him having a good performance after that injury. Not a Falcons fan but you can’t hate ‘em.
The only thing Spotify has going for it is the way it’s broken down music to the atomic level and given recommendations. Cool to crib some notes there even if I think it can be a bit overbearing when Spotify does it.
I agree with this. You can make a competent, easily digestible message that public safety, better quality of life, etc. comes from investing in common public services. Crime goes down when there’s better public health and education.
And they certainly don’t understand that safety has emerged from better public services but so it goes.
I appreciate anyone working on an actual community but doing the service of not just giving free content but free curation to a corporation seems unreal. Plus, I’m a grown adult. I don’t have the time to do all that much lol
Honestly, the US is largely safer than it’s ever been. Not sure why this is a constant drumbeat but folks will buy it up, I suppose.
Oh god. This sounds great.
I truly don’t understand how anyone does the free work for a corporation to moderate a subreddit. Steps like this seem to treat them like employees and they’ll largely just chug along with it for… what? Notoriety?
Okay, we don’t need to be too harsh on the PAC-12 but it’s probably a financial decision.
Will this stand up to the death of Chevron deference? Or are we 3 weeks away from a judge throwing the rule out unless congress passes a specific law.
I think this is squarely in the charter of the FTC but who knows with the courts any longer. We just saw them strike down a ruling by the EPA to enact health measures under the requirements of the Civil Rights Act.
I still want the “Turn off your computer before midnight” sticker someone made but, alas, CrowdStrike DMCA’d the Etsy account.
There’s a balance to be struck here but Cloudflare is truly the most miserable entity I have to work with from an abuse perspective. They’re not necessarily “ignoring” warrants but most phishing doesn’t get reported with a legal takedown request. In those cases, Cloudflare will be almost intentionally obtuse. I’m happy to outline the misery of a host working with Cloudflare but it’s not necessarily important to this. TLDR; Cloudflare takes steps that don’t make sense for its “we’re not responsible” stance while also having zero automation in the year of our lord 2024.
I suppose everything could be a legal request but that just makes the whole process so infinitely worse for NGOs like Spamhaus and only serves to make lawyers excited that their consultation fees are going up. I see that the laziest pathway is “Youtube-like strikes” which is misery as well but they could just shift to investigating accounts receiving a high volume of reports as potential fraud or abuse actors since it is a drag on their services and these accounts are not paying or are paying with stolen credit cards.
Ultimately, I don’t disagree with you that much but there’s a lot of room for CF to improve their management of fraud & abuse without becoming a trash platform or invalidating legal protections. Happy to get into the weeds on this a bit more since it’s a lil’ bit close to home. 😅
Oh, it will. And the wheels turn.
Exciting! Looking forward to this trickling down to regular App Store installs.