

Those same competitors exist even if you steal from them. If raising prices means they make less profit due to those competitors, then they can’t raise prices to offset losses either.


Those same competitors exist even if you steal from them. If raising prices means they make less profit due to those competitors, then they can’t raise prices to offset losses either.


> Have 0 cookies
> “Would you like a cookie?”
> “No”
> Have 0 cookies


I’m pretty sure that doesn’t work for small corporations where no one else even knows you exist. The share value is likely just going to be the company’s net asset value.


Pricing in the loss only makes sense if it recovered any of the losses. And if it did, I’m pretty sure they would’ve already done it regardless of whether there’s any loss since it would just be pure profit in its absence.
That’s easy to do. You just check that the username exists. If someone enters a wrong username/password pair, you can still check that the username exists, but how do you know that the user intended to log in with that username? You would also have to check every other username to see if the password matches, and that can’t be done with a simple search because you need to compute a different hash for each user you check. Then if the username exists and the password also happens to match someone else’s password, then what do you report? Should you even report it? Because doing so reveals that someone had that specific password, and if the list of usernames is publicly available (which they often are, or could become public through a leak of some sort), then you can brute force over a small set of usernames to match them up.


Kind of hard to turn against someone you never supported to begin with.
Mostly because you’re almost guaranteed to not get a straightforward answer.
Milk nullifies capsaicin though. You’ll probably have to use something like ginger. Lots of ginger. It would probably be delicious too now that I think about it.
Looks like green bell pepper rings to me. That’s a common pizza topping.


Huh. I always thought this was part of my asthma since exercise-induced asthma is a thing and I usually get this after an intense cardio-heavy session.


127.0.0.1:8000
Currency is an abstraction for all the goods and services you might barter. I can sell you a pair of shoes for 1 currency unit, then buy your pastries for 1 currency unit. The result is the same.
I can make good shoes. I make bad pastries.
You make good pastries. You make bad shoes.
I make you shoes. You make me pastries. Now I have good shoes and pastries. You also have good shoes and pastries. Everyone wins.


By the well ordering theorem, no matter what you choose as your definition of “chicken”, there must be a first.
Even scarier is putting a ton of effort into taking a step, then that step turns out to be a downward step.
It doesn’t help that Nutella has been advertised as being “part of a healthy breakfast”.
Achievements sometimes just don’t register (e.g. when playing a game with mods). I’ve been playing Factorio for many years and still don’t have most of the achievements despite having hit those milestones.
Then you can buy the art nobody is stopping you
Says the person trying to make it harder for me to find the artist that I should be buying from.


Any problem that requires active work to solve will benefit from having money thrown at it. Of course, that’s assuming the money is actually going towards solving the problem.
Ah, I thought “leader” meant presidents. Is there anyone supporting AOC besides Bernie? It doesn’t make sense to generalize one liberal’s actions to all liberals.
If we’re talking about support from their constituents, then what’s the alternative? Everyone else also supports the genocide and is also worse in every other respect.
This also supposes liberals are against the genocide. Most liberals I’ve heard from refuse to call it a genocide at all.