

I thought the demand was to return power to congress.


I thought the demand was to return power to congress.


Kind of? Its a discussion about the size of the United States, and how it is impossible to speak for the entirety. I won’t give you a play by play on the posts you just read, but it is all relevant to the discussion at hand.
Yeah, thats not a great look, but I also understand that since 2014 Ukraine has been in a war for its very existence with Russia, and that some neo nazi groups have done a lot of the fighting and dying for them.
I do not condone neo nazis, but I also understand Ukraine’s position not to shit on some of their best war fighters during a war for existence.
Its a complicated issue, and I think I would feel a stark difference had Ukraine been the aggressor, or had a repressive government (both things Russia is).
I believe that Ukraine will have to reckon with this if they survive the war, just like all countries will have to reckon with the far-right groups gaining traction and power in their countries.


I never lock my doors when I am home, that said, I do have home defense on lock. California.
Lock the doors if I remember to when I leave.
Never been robbed or even pick pocketed.


You say that, but you can fit a Saudi Arabia in there.


wow both under 10 square km, I have been navigating way wrong my whole life apparently.
Not sure what a blacked out vote means, but tons of countries voted in ways I don’t agree with on this one too, so not sure why anyone should be singled out (my original point, call out collectively the failures).
Yeah no my understanding has evolved based on the skim of the article and the actual wording becoming more clear - didn’t think they were going for champions of all time when I initially reacted.


Great point, they have come far, but my interactions have led me to believe they have come super far in faking it, not in actually understanding what is being done.
Maybe they have come further then I realize, but based on how easily they get tripped up on simple things and tie themselves into knots, the general models haven’t come too much further since.
dude I didn’t even know what that word meant until a week ago, but I sure know more about it now.


well it beats the lords prayer, thats what they say in red states. (thats a joke… I think)


I was saying this a week ago… He won’t be happy until he has sunk this country to the bottom of the ocean.
I don’t know what more I could of done to stop this, sorry all.


Also, sometimes it seems like the teleport across the map really fast? Is that an actual mechanic, or is that a bug? Because they will be a ways away, then suddenly trampling me, with very little in between.


I do remember talking to chatbots on AIM back in the day, so I think I had a leg up on other people in already understanding that the technology has existed for decades, which made me more cautious about the claims.


seems like large scale data analysis and mathematics are the strong points of AI if I understand the tools correctly, less ambiguity and room for hallucinations.
Do people agree?


deleted by creator


I mean, I don’t doubt that honestly, makes a lot more sense to me especially since they never got any reward money.
Also could of been a way to “legalize” the illegally obtained facial recognition, or some other form of illegal intelligence gathering.


Agreed, but what I am getting at is trying to determine an absolute earliest possible start date. The pile cannot be older than the oldest object in it, so regardless of any other factors, you can at least determine X is the earliest possible start date, then you can use other details to reconstruct other pieces of data (aka the other objects in the pile)
obviously there will be a range of ages, but I’m just following the thread of the oldest object for a starting point, not as an absolute age for everything in the pile.


Just blindly groping for that lost age that doesn’t actually exist.
Agreed, we are seeing a record number of congress people leaving office… I think its time for a new wave of politicians who are willing to work together.