If you kill a cyclist or minority pedestrian that is

sneering distrust of unions

sneering distrust of science

sneering distrust of socialism

sneering distrust of wikipedia

I’d say their sneering distrust of everything has brought us to where we are now.

That really sucks. I’m sorry for you.

On a different note - how tf could they fire your pregnant wife? Do you not have maternity protection where you live? What kind of colossal injustice is that?

Go to di.day for more info.

The risk isn’t derived from the technology but how it is used. The proprietary technology is used to prevent farmers from creating their own seed (including using copy right laws) while increasing their dependency on matching pesticides. Industrial agriculture is not sustainable - insect populations are dwindling because every square foot of landscape is sprayed with poison. GMO is used to further industrialize agriculture, e.g. by making crops resistant to poison, which in turn can (and will) be used more liberally.

If this person takes the risks of sickness and its life destroying consequences over the risks of vaccination, they’re an idiot.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X25011399 https://immune.org.nz/factsheets/comparison-of-possible-disease-complications-and-vaccine-responses

The equivalent of an architecture faculty member using an antique amphora as trash bin. Glad this was corrected tho, really beautiful square.

[…] But we should claim the right to suppress them [intolerant ideologies] if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols.

• Karl Popper on the paradox of tolerance

Meanwhile, immigrants, brown people, poor people and especially the homeless are considered less and less to be people.

Glad to provide you with a learning opportunity

They don’t really admit wrongdoing. They claim Trump deceived them, I assume about being a sexual predator and a pedophile.

They stand by their position on his policies, which are arguably worse for America than his depravity. Explicitly they mention the misogyny (abortion bans) and disregard for human lives (deregulation of guns), but claim to disagree on everything else - which must include climate and environmental protection, poverty and wealth, foreign policy etc.

This is learning from others’ mistakes huh? Can’t have religious zealot wreak havoc like in the US, or Israel…

Ty for the effort post. It’s all french to me so I was looking for arrows to nowhere, crooked lines, and messed up text.

Not trying to fight, just wanted to get some perspective of someone critical in a thread where everybody else is very positive. I didn’t read your username and didn’t notice I replied three times to the same guy.

What about it?

What’s too complicated exactly? They claim their program does precisely that. I believe you could review the code yourself.

There’s a study linking road rage to the level of authoritarianism in a country’s government. It’s also tightly linked to machismo.

I personally think that it has a lot to do with inadequate infrastructure that requires people to communicate while restricting possibilities for communication (i.e. multi lane roads with high speed limits), combined with lacking drivers’ ed and a fragmented highly individualistic society.

Yeah I didn’t get you right. Thanks for the explanation.

This is quite the opposite of what the image macro says

It’s just not as pretty as lawnchair