

The difference is that people are questioning whether they should keep trading in dollars. This is new.


The difference is that people are questioning whether they should keep trading in dollars. This is new.

also this was known decades ago. because Reagan was just as corrupt of Trump, nothing happened


if it helps, the US is imperialistic towards its own citizens


I think I get it: you were looking for that dopamine rush and suddenly discovered that you’re not a traditional consumer. Be glad, it means that you’re unlikely to become addicted to stuff like that.


Make Canada Great Again


There are so many reasons someone might have to go see a dentist. As much as I like to trash on Trump, this is a non-story.
ETA: Never mind, it’s pretty clear that this is a smoke screen for something else going on.
LOL my VM with WIN 11 does that


I’m somewhere in the middle. I am aware of both but really payed no attention to either.


OF course. Timing is everything


Not really. The Constitution says that the SCOTUS exists but other than that, Congress can manage it. There have been MANY more than 9 justices in the past, and there have been many less. In each case, Congress passed a law setting that number.


Plus about half the court would cycle out right this moment.


I’d like to say that nobody cared about security even 25 years ago, but in government, they have ALWAYS cared about security.


This is definitely a case of hurting anyone they could rather than targeting their rage. Now members of the public have to suffer it.


This may be generational. There is not likely to be much intersection between the group of people who listened to Streisand and those who listen to Swift.


Because the populace votes IRS current emotional state and not what they remember from before


He was central only because he happened to be mayor at the time. This is also someone who, before he was mayor and as a police officer, lead a charge on city hall and occupied it with other police because they were sad that a black man became mayor.
I’ve always become angry when journalists suggest that you reduce stress to fix this or that and I can’t figure out with they expected me to suddenly win the lottery.


Technically you need permission to dock. It means that the entire crew manifest was known to the government prior to arrival and they were given permission to dock. Then they were arrested. If there was a problem with them being in the US they should never have been given permission.


My ex and I were on food stamps at one point so I hope that my message didn’t come across as spam on those who use them. I was trying to explain to who I thought was a non US person who was not familiar with how it works.
What does it mean?