Step 8 and 10 sound like 1984:

The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. His heart sank as he thought of the enormous power arrayed against him, the ease with which any Party intellectual would overthrow him in debate, the subtle arguments which he would not be able to understand, much less answer.

https://unwall.app/www.axios.com/2026/08/30/grocery-inflation-prices-war-diesel

“Beyond the subject matter of this litigation, LLMs are already helping researchers across fields achieve major breakthroughs,” the brief said. “Constraining LLM development under a misunderstanding of fair use doctrine would thwart such creative and scientific progress while hindering American prosperity and economic mobility.”

Did OpenAi start developing LLM in the meantime? I must have missed the news

Oh thank you, I didn’t look into it

I also use Mapillary, I guess it is similar to Panoramax, cause it has the app and it’s well done.

Thank you for the link and informations, I wasn’t aware of the use in playgrounds

Do you put parking signs for car sizes in the USA?

Discovered you can self host Joplin and I can’t wait to set it up in the next days.

Also I tried some alternatives to ActualBudget, because I didn’t need to many functionalities. Long story short, I went back to it cause none offers a neat interface and multiple accounts at the same time.

Yeah it totally makes sense, how people use the information is then dangerous. But also the reader should fact check the answer from AI. Maybe a disclaimer in the answer could be a feasible fix.

asked it if it would respond to my fictional questions with fictional answers framed as real ones

I think that it cannot be considered a misinformation as long as you asked it to fictionally invent the answers. If there was no prompt like the “setup” then I would understand the disappointment in asking for a reliable information and getting an invented one (which happens around 10% of the time from what i recall).

I think that the test is not proving the spread of disinformation, even though it happens.

Different youtube front-end: https://invidious.nerdvpn.de/watch?v=ZaZPiwxPqO4

https://removepaywalls.com/www.newscientist.com/article/2580374-ais-solution-to-87-year-old-riddle-takes-mathematicians-by-surprise/

Whenever there is a paywall, insert “removepaywalls.com/” before the link

Apparentely it’s only considered a dependence and not an addiction, even though there are a lot of discussions about it.

Caffeine dependence:

Pathologically reinforced caffeine use induces dependence, but not an addiction.[13] For a drug to induce an addiction from repeated use at sufficiently high doses, it must activate the brain’s reward circuitry, particularly the mesolimbic pathway.[13]

The craziest for me is when the kid steps out: you may be distracted when you are alone (still no excuse) but at least focus when someone you care about is with you. Especially considering that there were other cars waiting at the red light

Yes, that’s exactly the channel i was thinking about. It is full of scientific proofs and goes into every detail of city planning

From what I remember, there is a youtube channel that has more than 100 videos designing a car free city. I cannot find the channel anymore though