Thanks friend, always appreciate a bit of solidarity in the face of stupid
Thanks friend, always appreciate a bit of solidarity in the face of stupid
Shhh don’t blow my cover
What happens when you bring a cat her toy?
She sighs, exasperated, and says, “I wanted you to open all the cabinet doors you fucking moron”
Shit I completely forgot this was a Canada story. That’s a whole ass other country! Fuck me for my nationalist centrism. Oh and **** jjjjjjjjjjjj
No no no fascists from different states are all doing isolationist shit
I don’t know the details, maybe those are sealed. I don’t know anything and I’m not a lawyer. The defendant may have a legal advantage in that no victim will testify (victim is a child, we don’t force children to testify).
It’s fug ing absurd ill give you that
“I’m not entirely satisfied with the sentence … but ultimately as a prosecutor I have to weigh things like the impact of actually having to testify on the victim of this crime,” said Ontario County Assistant District Attorney Kelly Wolford. “And she’s a child, and she was going to have to face her accuser in the courtroom. And when I was given the opportunity to consider whether or not we’d take a guilty plea – absolutely, all day, in a circumstance like this.”
**** edit this is Canada shit, happened in Canada, apologies, I think it’s relevant to the us *****
It’s really rough. The u.s. judicial system is not prepared to deal with this.
FYI we’re only doing state and local politics in the USA now, so no reason to connect Minnesota with North Carolina
OP found a friend but decided to have a panic attack over it. Same bro. Happens to me on the regular. Maybe stuff a $20 in the tip jar next time. Or bring them a bottle of random Prosecco and then awkwardly leave.
No, there is that, but this is not all that organized. It’s easy to say ha ha, boomers dumb, but it’s wild to think of how crypto schemes have shifted potentially billions of imaginary wealth into the real pockets of randos
Unfortunately, that particular legal brief that I read, which was written by “real lawyers”, used “turgid” in reference to genitalia. The argument had something to do with the intent of undercover officers in strip clubs. I’ve forgotten why the cops were there to begin with, but my relative has a career in representing cops when they did illegal and horrible stuff. I am NOT defending any of that.
The difference between the jacobin article and the bbc article is astronomical. The first one is meaningless garbage. The second is just an article, and I’m not a BBC Stan, but c’mon. If Jacobin is all you can get, then just turn it off.
Could it be written by AI, or a fucking idiot:
Cheese necklaces, really interesting, really old. Ancient Chinese thing. Not unusual.
Cheese necklaces? No curiosity from the writer?
Your work is shit. Do better.
Never heard of this bird. I guess it pukes a lot. here’s what it sounds like
https://www.rnz.co.nz/national/programmes/birds-on-morning-report/audio/2599117/puteketeke
Why u post crap, OP? the actual link with the actual reporting is right there in what you posted:
This sounds bizarre and I need more context and information. Why is your only link a yt video? That shit takes forever to load.
Could be a troll? The only difference is that food service is gross and squishy. Amazon has so automated the box packing that the hardest part is getting zoned out in the monotony and forgetting some critical step before you send the box away.
“Skilled labor” lmao. Look it up and sites like indeed.com call it having a law degree.
You didn’t read any of it did you?