valaramech

To extend this a little bit, I’m not convinced “is X conscious?” is really the question anyone is trying to answer. What I think we’re really trying to sus out is “does X require rights?” and where is the line for that.

As another commenter asked, something like “is turning this off equivalent to murder?” is effectively asking if the thing deserves a “right to life” like any human might. At what point does a “thinking machine” cross the line from “person-like” to “person”? I doubt anyone has a satisfactory answer to that question and, unfortunately, I strongly doubt we’ll have one until well after it’s actually needed.

I think grappling with that question is maybe a little more straightforward when we consider other animals we already consider highly intelligent (e.g. pigs, dolphins, or octopi) but that we don’t give the same kinds of rights to that we would a human. At what point would we consider a non-human animal to be equal to ourselves? How many person-like traits does something need before it is a person?

Anyways, all that aside, I think we should start asking the questions we’re really trying to answer and stop using other questions as proxies for that one.

I wouldn’t be surprised if all shells have some form of that, but not enabled by default. I know Bash does, but I’ve never turned it on.

If a state-actor doxxing you is in your threat model, using any social media should be verboten - even under a pseudonym.

In situations like this, the answer isn’t to argue over the interpretation of the words: it’s to fix the words.

If the writers intended “no excessive capitalization or excessive grammatical errors”, then it should be changed to that.

If the writers intended “no excessive capitalization and no grammatical errors”, then it should be changed to that.

Both situations remove the ambiguity and prevent pedantic internet arguments about language interpretation.

If the adverts are completely optional, this is the best way to do it. “Here, if you watch this ad we’ll give you free shit!” is way more likely to get me to watch whatever it is, but “You will watch this ad or you won’t get to play anymore” is the fastest way to get me to uninstall.

Pfff, all these amateurs here using Vim. Y’all should use Emacs. You still have all of these problems, but you get to act all superior about it. /s (except for the superiority complex; that’s real)

There are places to work that aren’t complete dogshit, but you do have to avoid FinTech, FAANG, and probably anything with a lot of VC funding. You will make less money, but at least you won’t be asked to do morally reprehensible shit on the regular.

Some of my best experiences have actually been at non-tech companies with small IT teams for internal shit. Biggest team I’ve ever worked on was 30 devs and that’s probably about the largest team I’d want to work with.

EDIT: This does assume you’re working in the States which is a dumb assumption for me to make. I’m not familiar with the culture outside of the states, but I imagine it’s better than here.

I think the biggest problem is that the idea of copyright is good, but the implementation - in most places, anyways - is complete dogshit.

Like, I’m fairly certain the original implementation of copyright in the US only lasted 10 years or thereabouts. Like, that’s more than enough time to profit off whatever you made but short enough that it’ll be usable by others within their lifetimes. This whole “life of the author + 100 years” shit needs to die.

thank mr skeltal

Every accusation is an admission.

Weird, I found the Arch-based one once but now I can’t find it. Everything keeps pointing me back to that page…

EDIT: All I can find now is HoloISO - which seems to be in a reasonable place, I guess.

I’ve been wondering for a little while now if WinApps will work for gaming. It uses a VM in the background but, supposedly, has a “native” experience. Thoughts?

You can also install SteamOS which is literally what the Steam Deck runs.

EDIT: Disregard, I can’t read.

My understanding is that running most of BlueSky is possible on small to moderate hardware. However, running all of BlueSky requires basically cloning 100% of all the content on BlueSky (which, as of Nov 2024, was ~5 TB).

So, like, yes, one can run part of BlueSky or a clone of BlueSky which has none of the main instance’s user’s content without much trouble, but actually running an entire BlueSky stack is eventually going to become cost prohibitive.

I found this write-up to be enlightening on the subject.

Ah, yes, let’s make the already illegal thing even more illegal. As if that ever stopped anyone…

Kurzgesagt made a video that I think is related to this. I found it rather enlightening: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fuFlMtZmvY0

We don’t do that here

Unless you live in California, they kinda do.

I use uMatrix (uBlock’s big brother), so sites that do this generally lose first-party JS privileges real fast.

Have you met these people IRL or online? Most of the people I’ve met online do fall into one of those two buckets, but almost nobody I’ve met IRL does.

I would assume this is selection bias before attributing it to some other thing. The kinds of circles you run in are going to heavily affect this.

I read a decent rebuttal to the “paradox” of tolerance. To summarize for those that don’t know, the idea is that tolerance is a social contract. You tolerate everyone that’s behaving according to the contract. Refusing to tolerate someone that has broken the contract isn’t a violation of the contract; it’s required in order to enforce the contract.

You break the rules, you lose the protections. Simple as.