• towerful@programming.dev
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Those “once in a lifetime” or “once in a decade” weather events seem to be quite common these days

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      1 month ago

      “Another 100 year flood” seems like a ridiculous headline at this point. Denial is everywhere.

      • Transporter Room 3@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 month ago

        “sure, the forest I played in as a kid is silent, the trees are dying, insects are sparse, we go back and forth between buried in 10ft of snow and heat wave drought inside a month, the river is low enough that it exposed carvings of 1,000 year old famine warnings, but we keep getting flooded every year with once in a lifetime storms, but there’s NO EVIDENCE of climate change and I can prove it because [politician/company] said so”

      • FlihpFlorp@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Somewhat off topic but just some trivia from a geology weather class I took

        100 year flood does not mean it happens every 100 years but there’s a 1/100 chance for it to happen annually

        Putting climate change aside for a second for consistency sake, you could go for 150 or 200 years without a 100 year flood or on the other side only a 5 year gap for that 100 year flood if you’re unlucky

        • Rhaedas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 month ago

          That’s correct, it’s about probability based on past known history. An area could get unlucky and have repeat conditions sooner than normal. When many areas appear to be having this same bad luck, it’s time to reevaluate the probabilities. It’s also why regular weather forecasts haven’t seemed to get things as right as they used to…using the past percent chance probabilities in a changing environment doesn’t hit as well as it used to.

          • FlihpFlorp@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Thanks for the input it never crossed my mind that weather (the thing that we can only predict) changes when the past data is no longer relevant

        • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          And a big problem we’re having is that due to climate change those 1/100 chance events are changing for the worst.

          • FlihpFlorp@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            Oh 10000% it’s why I said ignoring climate change. Weather events are getting more frequent and more extreme

    • sudo42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      seem to be quite common these days

      As well as “once in a lifetime” financial crisis in the US.