• DessertStorms@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      The woman who introduced the reconstruction noted that the fabric they painted over her lower half was harder to “see” under, so it might still not be exactly as originally painted, but it’s definitely closer than how it is now.

    • apis@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Heavy draperies added to censor the painting seem to follow the same shape on the lower body, and the article mentions Artemesia’s delicate glazes under the overpainting.

      So though the article doesn’t state that she painted this translucent veil, or if it is included in the digital reconstruction to indicate a query researchers were unable to resolve categorically, she included similarly diaphanous fabric in this nude https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b0/Artemisia_Gentileschi_-_Sleeping_Venus.JPG

        • apis@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Eh, wash & glaze are kinda the same from our perspective as viewers - just differentiates type of solvent used, as determined by binding media.

          • craftyindividual@lemm.eeM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Yeah, it only really matters with oils… need to go fat/thick over lean/thin otherwise the paint layers tenses and cracks off. Great fun