Kyle Rittenhouse abruptly departed the stage during an appearance at the University of Memphis on Wednesday, after he was confronted about comments made by Turning Point USA founder and president Charlie Kirk.

Rittenhouse was invited by the college’s Turning Point USA chapter to speak at the campus. However, the event was met with backlash from a number of students who objected to Rittenhouse’s presence.

The 21-year-old gained notoriety in August 2020 when, at the age of 17, he shot and killed two men—Joseph Rosenbaum, 36, and Anthony Huber, 26, as well as injuring 26-year-old Gaige Grosskreutz—at a protest in Kenosha, Wisconsin.

He said the three shootings, carried out with a semi-automatic AR-15-style firearm, were in self-defense. The Black Lives Matter (BLM) protest where the shootings took place was held after Jacob Blake, a Black man, was left paralyzed from the waist down after he was shot by a white police officer.

  • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Even if you don’t think it was murder, it’s repulsive that he is trying to make a career out of killing two people.

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    this dude bought a gun illegally (wasnt charged because of a loop hole) recklessly endangered numerous people. His parents fucking allowed this shit

    AND he has the audacity to be a political figure? Fuck this guy, seriously.

    • ZK686@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Never mind he was found not guilty right? Because you know, public opinion matters more…

  • someguy3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    “Charlie Kirk has said a lot of racist things,” said a student addressing Rittenhouse from the audience.

    “What racist things has Charlie Kirk said?” Rittenhouse challenged. “We’re gonna have a little bit of a dialogue of what racist things that Charlie Kirk said.”

    The student responded of Kirk: “He says that we shouldn’t celebrate Juneteenth, we shouldn’t celebrate Martin Luther King day—we should be working those days—he called Ketanji Brown Jackson an affirmative action hire, he said all this nonsense about George Floyd, and he said he’d be scared if a Black pilot was on a plane. Does that not seem racist?”

    “I don’t know anything about that,” Rittenhouse said from the stage, prompting jeers among the audience.

    “Does that seem racist is a yes or no question, Kyle,” yelled one attendee.

    “Well, after all the things I just told you, would you consider that hate speech,” the student asked Rittenhouse, who had a dog with him onstage.

    “I’m not gonna comment on that,” Rittenhouse said, sparking more noise from the crowd.

    Seconds later, Rittenhouse abruptly exited the stage to cheers from the crowd. The attendees were then promptly ordered to depart the venue.

    • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      They fly him around the country, but the media outfit he’s working for didn’t bother to invest in media training for their homicidal poster boy?

      So much for standing your ground.

  • DozensOfDonner@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Maybe I’m missing something as I’m not from the states. Why the hell is a guy who is famous for murder invites to talk at a university?

    • Captain Janeway@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Rittenhouse was invited to speak at Wednesday’s event by the university’s Turning Point USA (TPUSA) chapter. Founded in 2012, the non-profit promotes conservative politics at schools and college campuses.

  • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    he was at the demonstration to “protect businesses and provide medical assistance.”

    Remember kids: you can take lives to protect property. You can not damage property to protect lives.

        • Flax@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah, but the shots were in self defence, even though he shouldn’t have been there

          • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            So back to my comment:
            He can go there, with his gun, to potentially take lives to protect property.
            This is because the protestors are not allowed to damage property to protect lives.

            • ZK686@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              WTF are you smoking? The dudes ATTACKED HIM FIRST… damn man…seems like you guys just insist on ignoring the facts.

      • ZK686@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yea, but you’re on Redd…I mean, Lemmy… so, the looters, arsonists and burglars get a pass…

        • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Right, because property is more important than people.

          Your only way of disparaging these people is “they were damaging property!” Which last I checked did not carry the death sentence.
          Put them in front of a jury and a death sentence would be monstrous, put them in front of a vigilante and “they had it coming for stealing!”

          • ZK686@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            “Property is more important than people” is a phrase being thrown around by the Left to try and make the Rittenhouse situation into something it isn’t. He didn’t go there to kill anyone. He went there to help defend stores, like 1000’s of others did throughout the country (remember during the LA riots, Koreans sitting on top of their stores with guns? Were they horrible because they cared about their belongings?). He was attacked by some low lives who fucked around and found out.

    • ZK686@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Remember kids, you can riot, burn, and loot… as long as it’s “for a good cause.”

      • Sami_Uso@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        The Boston tea party is taught to every single kid in this country, give me a break. We’re a country built on rioting burning and looting.

        • ZK686@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Lol…okay, let’s compare the Boston Tea Party to people taking part in criminal acts in their own communities…

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I almost feel sorry for how this kid is going to be forever type-cast as a stupid gun-nut culture warrior type. Before his brain has even fully developed. What a disaster. What he did was gawdawful but it’s likely he will NEVER learn from his mistake and become a whole human being. Not when being a total dumbass for the RW elitists willing to fund such things pays a lot better than the alternative, I bet.

    And when people talk about how what he did was in “self defense”…I always ask, what fuck was he even doing there in the first place? He had zero reason to be there.

    • ZK686@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      He won’t learn from his mistakes, because despite being found NOT GUILTY in a court of law, he’s still crucified by everyone, including social media like Lemmy. It’s like when that dude with a smirk who was being yelled at by the Indian…the only thing people wanted to do is punch that kid… without even knowing the context. And, even after finding out the truth (how the Indians were in his face intimidating him) people still talk shit to him for being a Trump supporter…

  • ZK686@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    This dude is 100% innocent …ya’ll just mad that he killed two criminals.

  • ZK686@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    If this kid was black, you’d all be praising him for killing two white people who were attacking him. The reason Lemmy and Reddit hate this dude is because you associate him with some kind of “white privilege” for going to help defend businesses from being destroyed (at the request of the city’s businesses who had enough of the rioting and torching) he ends up defending himself against criminals who were there just to cause problems.

    • Ragdoll X@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      He actively sought out confrontation and killed two people after he got the confrontation he wanted. The right idolizes him because he’s a murderer and buddied up to white supremacists, and now he’s pandering to them for money and affirmation, and runs away as soon as he faces any criticism.

      So no, we don’t dislike him for being white. We dislike him for being just like any other fascist grifter who fetishizes violence.

    • Eggyhead@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Had a cheeky peek at your comment history and it sure seems like you’re at war with reality, friend. You do you, but that fight is never going to end.

      • ZK686@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        “War with reality” is your way of saying “we must all think, act, and feel the same. If we’re not all liberals voting Democrat, than our country is doomed!”

        • Mastengwe@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          “War with reality” means you are adamantly denying reality to the point that you’ll argue with people to protect your belief in the propaganda you’ve fallen for.