• DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 months ago

    Alberta doesn’t really get involved in alcohol the same way that provinces that care about their population does.

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Trust me Ontario government doesn’t care about its people, they just regulate the hell out of alcohol in order to milk the money. They’re doing the same with gambling

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Trust me Ontario government doesn’t care about its people, they just regulate the hell out of alcohol

        But I was promised “buck a beer”…

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s true both that the current government doesn’t give a shit, and we don’t regulate alcohol much, but I’m guessing alcohol use rates are actually not that bad. Stereotypically, anyway, the Maratimes should all drink us under the table.

    • voluble@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      AB government advocacy for local craft producers: Drake no

      AB government advocacy for gambling and cannabis: Drake yes

      The liquor regulation system in Alberta is prohibitionary already. What changes would you want to see?

      • Jarix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Drake is a Pedo.

        Can you please consider using an alternate format like Geordi in the future to make that future a better place

        My thanks for your and everyone’s consideration.

        Edit: fixedlink. an excellent lemming pointed out i hadnt copied the article i thought i had. Should have been about wrong Pedo named Drake. Apparently theres more than one.

          • Jarix@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Ahh fack. Thanks. I meant to change the article i copied but didnt copy the correct one. Thanks for being my editor, even if it wasnt your goal!

            Much love. Ill go fix it with the correct article about Drake from degrassi and who is also the rapper, and the pedo shit he was caught doing that we know about

            Edit for clarity(i hope)

        • voluble@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Alberta does have minimum prices for both wholesale as well as on-premise liquor.

          • DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Based on this image, I just assumed that they didn’t.

            That jug is 160 units for $50. $0.31 per unit is a little low.

            • voluble@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Minimum pricing in AB, AFAIK, is regulated on the wholesale price of the product. So, producers are regulated, but retail stores aren’t prevented from competition, loss leaders, stunts, etc., which is what this might be.

              Given that the tax money from alcohol/tobacco just goes into provincial and federal slush funds that proportionately end up being funneled into seniors benefits, I don’t believe minimum pricing really addresses the things that people think it does. I’m an advocate of directing alcohol taxes towards the harms it creates. But, try to find a politician who wants to grind that axe. I say this as someone who enjoys a good beverage, & acknowledging the pragmatic importance of offsetting the healthcare costs of alcohol abuse. I don’t believe that simply making a good more expensive is the wisest move on the policy side, if healthcare outcomes are the ultimate target.