He shot and missed one and attempted to get another in his truck to bring to police.

      • InevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        I don’t know anything about it. My wild guess is that progressives wrote the law so it can be more inclusive and it’s easier to charge people. If my wild assumption is right - I assume the punishments are weak.

        • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 months ago

          I said this in another comment but I’ll say it here too: It makes me feel less safe having people soften the language. I do not trust the people that came up with this at all, they wanted to soften the language and used some fringe situations where the language doesn’t apply as a means of softening the language for ALL situations under the guise of broadening or “including” other things.

          • built_on_hope [she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            6 months ago

            I think it also feeds into the chud narrative “they’re criminalising everything that’s not woke” (à la Peterson and claiming that using incorrect pronouns would land you in jail)

            • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Yeah there’s just no need to soften the language for the existing things when you can give a new word to the things that don’t fit into it.

              The only reason to include them is to deliberately soften the existing language. It’s deeply sus behaviour and I don’t trust the people that did it. I categorically oppose any attempt to soften the description of hate crimes.