• Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago
    • The first two want to consolidate power first. Typical capitalist move, get to the top, then pull the ladder up behind you.
    • The third guy has a sensible idea.
    • The ‘ban Liberalism’ guy probably can’t define Liberalism.
    • The ‘ban factory farms’ guy has a good idea.
    • The ‘ban cars’ crowd I sorta agree with. Cars should only be used in rural areas, where public transit is not viable.
    • The anti-Israel guy, wants to ban countries from solidarizing with Israel. An inherently pro-war take.
    • Historical Revisionism, I had to look up who Adrian Zenz is, and Zenz is critical of the Uyghur genocide. So yeah, Historical Revisionism just means ‘anything I don’t like’ to this commenter.

    Edit: Changed ‘urban’ to ‘rural’ as pointed out by @goat.

    • goat@sh.itjust.worksOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The third guy has a sensible idea.

      Yeah, though that’s going to be insanely costly for the government. Best solution is offering a cheap, readily available public version and then the premium services.

      The ‘ban factory farms’ guy has a good idea.

      It is! But ironically, animals are and have always been treated the worst in communist states.

      The ‘ban cars’ crowd I sorta agree with. Cars should only be used in urban areas, where public transit is not viable.

      You mean rural?

      • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        You mean rural? Yes, rural. Thanks for pointing that out. Yeah, though that’s going to be insanely costly for the government. Best solution is offering a cheap, readily available public version and then the premium services. Well, services naturally cost money. But yes, allowing private services would also be good. I’m just worried that the public version falls too far behind in terms of quality provided. As in, politicians see that the private version is only a bit more expensive than the public one, and therefore slash funding for the public version, causing the public quality to decrease, after which the private provider see higher demand, and then increase prices.

    • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s because a non trivial portion of them are legitimately Poe’s law trolls and the tankies are completely blind to it.