A reminder that as the US continues to threaten countries around the world, fedposting is to be very much avoided (even with qualifiers like “in Minecraft”) and comments containing it will be removed.

Image is a map of Middle Eastern oil/gas production sites, which Iran has promised to strike in retaliation if their own energy infrastructure comes under attack.


My weekly preamble is in spoiler tags below.

preamble

For the weekend of August 1-2, Trump had once again promised major strikes on Iran, which would have included crossing the critical red line of striking their energy infrastructure. In response, Iran once again essentially promised to end the possibility of modern civilization as we know it throughout much of the Gulf States and, to a certain extent, the Zionist entity, with the economic impacts radiating outwards around the world from there. The frustrating part about these threats from Trump is that while he’s reneged on them before, the consequences of them actually occurring are so dire that it’s difficult to ignore them; rolling a dice with even a 5% chance for complete catastrophe will always be nerve-wracking.

Anyway, as we all know, these strikes did not occur, with the excuse this time being much the same as the previous times: our regional allies begged us not to (potentially true) and Iran called us and said they were willing to negotiate/surrender (untrue). The point of these threat displays is at least twofold: first, to see if Iran is genuinely going to flinch, or, at least, if internal elements that may or may not exist will be spooked into action against the IRGC; and second, to manipulate oil prices downwards by creating constant cycles of “relief” out of an otherwise relatively constant downward trend as Hormuz stays closed and oil reserves continue to ebb. I do say “relatively”, of course, given that Ansarallah now appears to be delivering a boot up the ass of Saudi Arabia by taking offline quite a lot of its refinery infrastructure.

It is into this situation that Ukraine seems to want in. For those out of the loop, the situation over in Ukraine has largely the same overall attritional dynamics as previous years, but with a few added wrinkles. Ukraine started striking Russian infrastructure a while ago, and while their effectiveness is hotly debated and I don’t want to dismiss them as totally ineffectual, it’s clear that the psychological effects - such as they are - are greater than the material effects. Russia’s retaliation strikes have been considerably more impactful, including strikes on Ukrainian Black Sea ports and vessels, and a campaign explicitly against gas stations across Ukraine, as well as some rather impressive and disruptive explosions at Ukrainian military fairs and production sites. Zelensky has admitted publicly that they are now basically out of Patriot missiles and that Russian missiles are now landing entirely unopposed (beforehand, they were just landing largely unopposed, given the lackluster performance of Western air defences in general). He seems to have considered a possible way out: linking together the Ukraine and Iran Wars to a united front against Russia and Iran, which would then grant Ukraine more munitions to keep fighting on.

Now, for all the fear I’ve seen of this occurring (and, don’t get me wrong, the US and Russia being in non-proxy, direct conflict is a genuinely frightening prospect for continued life on Earth) how linking together two wars which the West is quite decisively losing into a single war would help at all is beyond me. At this moment, at least, US military planners appear to agree with me. Ukraine hit a Caspian Sea vessel going to Iran a while ago, but then seems to have quickly apologised after being given a stern talking to by the US. This shows just how willing the US is to grant Ukraine more aid, as their own interceptor stockpile is running very low due to Iranian strikes. One would almost feel sympathy for Zelensky if is wasn’t for… well, everything that’s happened. The path of Ngô Đình Diệm is a tough one to walk.


Last week’s thread is here.
The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the RedAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine

If you have evidence of Zionist crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on the Zionists’ destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

Mirrors of Telegram channels that have been erased by Zionist censorship.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don’t want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it’s just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists’ side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR’s former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR’s forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster’s telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a ‘propaganda tax’, if you don’t believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


  • Redcuban1959 [any]@hexbear.netM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    2 days ago

    China’s Intelligence Service (MSS) has warned Spain about evidence suggesting that Israel’s Mossad is behind the crisis involving Moroccan “immigrants” who have invaded Ceuta. Mossad’s objective is allegedly to punish Spanish opposition to the US war against Iran.

    • Not sure why they opt to use scare quotes when the people are immigrants, they’re Morrocco’s leverage against the EU, but it’s only thanks to Pissrael and the USA that the equation has changed.

      If you (generally any Western European country) wants to resolve this, the only thing that can be done is to let the people in and stop allowing these vichy regimes to manipulate your politics and economy through maintaining a permanent underclass of desperate human beings at your border.

      • demeritum@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        ·
        1 day ago

        Europeans made their beds when they destabilized economies and then paid transit countries to essentially imprison and hoard migrants they didn’t want.

        But its true that the empire is manipulating the situation for its own benefit (I guess somehow they thought they never would run the ire of it?)

        • Yup, my frustration is that so many “anti imperialists” are actually fine with the products of imperialism if they’re not reflected onto the imperial core (gasp!) rather than understanding that paying Morroco, Turkey, Rwanda, etc. to keep these people away is just turning human beings into a unit of exchange ripe for the exploitation of the primary financial hegemon of the world.

      • Redcuban1959 [any]@hexbear.netM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        47
        ·
        1 day ago

        Not sure why they opt to use scare quotes when the people are immigrants, they’re Morocco’s leverage against the EU, but it’s only thanks to Pissrael and the USA that the equation has changed.

        I think some people (specially in Spain, and some people in Arab nations who hate Morocco) believe these are rioters paid by Israel and the Morrocan goverment to attack Spain.

        If you (generally any Western European country) wants to resolve this, the only thing that can be done is to let the people in and stop allowing these vichy regimes to manipulate your politics and economy through maintaining a permanent underclass of desperate human beings at your border.

        That’s what the Algeria goverment have said. But Spain and specially France, have been enabling Morocco’s imperialism for decades now. Spain even sold out the Polisario Front and agreed to support Morocco occupation and creation of a Bantustan in Western Sahara. And then they act surprised when Morocco betrays them in favor of Israel and the US.

      • Redcuban1959 [any]@hexbear.netM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        1 day ago

        Why Chinese intelligence believes Mossad may be behind the migration crisis in Ceuta - El Mundo

        Article

        Beijing views the Spanish city’s migration crisis through the lens of geopolitics and hybrid warfare, while consolidating Morocco as one of its main strategic partners in Africa.

        What if the massive influx of migrants to Ceuta were part of an intelligence operation orchestrated by Morocco and Israel to destabilize Spain? This is the theory gaining traction in some Chinese academic and intelligence circles. Beijing officials conveyed this view in conversations with this newspaper about how the migration crisis in the Spanish autonomous city has been perceived in the world’s second-largest economy.

        This week, Egyptian political scientist Nadia Helmy, a specialist in Chinese politics and Sino-Israeli relations, openly endorsed this theory in an article published by Modern Diplomacy , an international journal specializing in geopolitical analysis. The author argues that some reports prepared in Beijing interpret the events in Ceuta as a hybrid warfare operation intended to increase pressure on the government of Pedro Sánchez . According to this interpretation, the maneuver involved the Mossad, the Israeli intelligence service, which is interested in promoting a destabilization campaign against Spain.

        Helmy contrasts this interpretation with the coverage by the main Chinese state media, such as CGTN or Xinhua, which focused mainly on the deployment of the Spanish Army and the implications of the crisis for the external borders of the European Union.

        “Chinese intelligence analysis centers have examined the escalation of diplomatic and political tensions between Spain and Israel. From that perspective, the deterioration of bilateral relations could have motivated Mossad to become involved in the migration crisis between Morocco and Spain, exacerbating the situation and infiltrating agents to foment discontent and chaos among the Moroccan population,” Helmy explains.

        In private conversations, some diplomats and analysts close to political circles in Beijing are also wondering if the assault on Ceuta has any relation to the progressive deterioration of relations between Madrid and Israel, marked by the Spanish government’s criticism of the massacre in Gaza and the recognition of the Palestinian state.

        “Since the normalization of relations in 2020, Morocco and Israel have become allies and have strengthened their defense and intelligence cooperation,” a diplomat commented.

        The theory has also resonated outside of China. Colombian President Gustavo Petro directly pointed to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as ultimately responsible for the migration crisis in Ceuta. He asserted that the Israeli leader “pays the poor to risk their lives to reach Spain” and that Morocco “has surrendered to the designs of a fugitive genocidal maniac,” linking the migrant influx to the close relationship between Rabat and Tel Aviv. Petro also accused the Israeli prime minister of promoting destabilization campaigns against governments that question his policies in the Middle East.

        In China , a country where border control is a cornerstone of national security, images of thousands of people crossing into Spanish territory provoked a mixture of astonishment and disbelief among many Chinese social media users. “How is it possible for them to cross the border so easily?” was one of the most frequently asked questions.

        The official press also focused on the political consequences for Europe. “The Ceuta crisis has exposed the shortcomings of the EU’s post-2015 migration reforms and highlights the bloc’s difficulties in building a unified response,” said Cui Hongjian, a professor at Beijing Foreign Studies University, in an interview with the Global Times , which published an extensive analysis of the tensions that have arisen within the European Union following the events at the Spanish border.

        Beyond the migration dimension, Chinese officials and diplomats explain that in Beijing the crisis is viewed primarily from a geostrategic perspective. Ceuta appears as another piece in the complex chessboard of the Western Mediterranean, a region where essential maritime routes, port infrastructure, energy supplies, and a growing Chinese economic presence converge.

        The close relationship between the governments of Pedro Sánchez and Xi Jinping has been exemplified by the Spanish president’s four visits to Beijing, more than any other European leader, solidifying Spain’s position as one of the most receptive interlocutors with China within the European Union. However, for the communist regime, Morocco has become one of its most strategically important partners in Africa.

        Morocco, a trading partner for China

        In just five years, Rabat and Beijing have significantly strengthened their economic relations through major infrastructure projects and trade agreements that position the Alawite kingdom as one of China’s main gateways to both the African and European markets.

        The investment is particularly evident in the manufacturing sector. Dozens of Chinese companies have announced multi-million dollar investments to build factories for electric vehicle components, batteries, and strategic materials in Morocco. This choice is due to several factors: political stability, free trade agreements with the European Union and the United States , abundant phosphate reserves—key to battery manufacturing—and a prime location just 14 kilometers from Europe.

        Beijing believes that Morocco can play a role similar to that which Vietnam has assumed in Asia: an industrial platform from which to supply Western markets, circumventing some of the growing trade barriers that affect exports coming directly from China.

        This is further complemented by increasingly intensive cooperation in infrastructure. Chinese state-owned enterprises are involved in railway, energy, and port projects , while the port of Tangier Med—the largest in the Mediterranean and one of the world’s leading ports in terms of container traffic—has established itself as a logistics hub of enormous value for Chinese supply chains. From there, goods can be rapidly distributed to Europe and West Africa, reinforcing Morocco’s role as a continental logistics platform.

        That is why, every time a crisis erupts in Ceuta or anywhere in northern Morocco, Beijing calculates the possible impact on one of its economic partners whose strategic importance continues to grow.