I think you two might be talking past each other.

vzqq never claimed Bill was held sufficiently accountable, or held accountable at all for that matter. They stated a belief that there should be accountability for that kind of thing, which you clearly agree with. That’s probably why they didn’t engage your comment. They never claimed anything was a win, so they didn’t see how your point applied. Which honestly, it kinda didn’t.

So when you brought up Monica being treated far worse than Bill, they read it as “the people who attacked Monica were worse than her sexual predator of a boss.” Stripped of the context you made it in, and given they already agreed Bill should have been held accountable, they assumed you must be contesting something else. Their interpretation of which was a stretch, their own shock at it probably should have tipped them off, but they were pretty clearly just confused by then.

Sorry for the diatribe. I just hate watching two people who agree argue over a misunderstanding, especially when the ethics they both hold are fundamentally sound.