• NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    […] react very quickly to increased demand. You categorically cannot do that with nuclear, where did you learn this?

    This is not correct.

    A Brief Survey of Load-Following Capabilities in Modern Nuclear Power Plants

    Load-following NPPs in France claim power output ramps as much as 5%/min if necessary, though typical ramps are kept below 1.5%/min.

    Certain French NPPs routinely decrease power output 50% at night.

    It’s true that load-following is mostly not done with nuclear in the US, but this is policy/common practice/habit, not a technical limitation of nuclear power plants.

    Also, I mentioned pumped hydro storage to point out specifically that battery technology really isn’t effective enough yet. It still doesn’t scale well, it’s too expensive for large grids.

    • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      This is not correct.

      It is, you just proved it yourself:

      “typical ramps are kept below 1.5%/min.”

      Compare that with batteries or pumped hydro.

      • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        That’s plenty fast enough for a power grid.

        1.5% of 900MW is 13.5MW. That’s plenty of power output scaling per minute.

        • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I think you’re getting peaker plants, e.g gas fired confused with load following.

          Nuclear plants are not used as peaker plants. you incorrectly stated that they are.