A few days ago, the U.S. government sanctioned A/I for supporting “extreme far-left antifa terrorists”. If you didn’t know, A/I is an antifascist and anticapitalist group based in Italy, and they host a lot of services (like email, website hosting, etc.) run through donations. Their policy states that they are against racism, sexism, militarism, homophobia, and transphobia, and you have to agree to those principles to use their services. Their website and mailing server has been taken down, and unfortunately, that also means my email no longer works. It’s kind of insane how quickly the American government can take down internet services they don’t like. A/I has denied all of the allegations by the Trump admin, and rightfully so, they’re just a digital services provider who respect your privacy and are against fascism and bigotry.

relevant link if you want to read more about this: https://cavallette.noblogs.org/2026/08/10076

I still need to use email, so what’s a good alternative email provider that doesn’t profit off of my data? I have used Disroot in the past and had good experiences with their services, so they are currently my fallback. I have ruled out Proton and Tuta, as neither support IMAP properly.

    • quick_snail@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      17 hours ago

      The precedent also reaches beyond explicitly anarchist or antifascist projects. If political alignment with users, privacy protections and the hosting of controversial publications can be assembled into a case that infrastructure itself constitutes support, then encrypted mail providers, radical publishers, community archives, VPNs, federated social networks, legal-support projects and other independent hosts all have reason to pay attention

  • quick_snail@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    Iirc AI designed their systems to be decentralized

    They’re Italian and run servers all over the world outside the jurisdiction of the US executive branch.

    If they’re down, I assume it’s temporary. Anyway, noblogs had a list of other tech collectives on their website. You can surely load it on way back machine

  • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    17 hours ago

    It’s really BS how they’re considered a “terrorist group” while real terrorist groups like the IDF continue killing innocent people

    • 𝕱𝖎𝖗𝖊𝖜𝖎𝖙𝖈𝖍@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The Trump regime is proud of that. They are happy to do all the signalling that they are full blown fascists short of admitting directly to it. That way there’s enough “reasonable doubt” that they can sell their snake oil to idiots.

      • Nouvellalia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 day ago

        You are infantilizing the fascist underbelly that supports trump.

        The “reasonable doubt” isn’t to confuse “idiots”. These “idiots” see through it just like you. The “reasonable doubt” is to give the “idiots” cover against their neighbors, friends, and family.

        They know very well what they are voting for, but they are cowards. All fascists are cowards. They will not fight unless they have overwhelming advantage.

        Their ideologies stem from deep fear, better described as a life enveloping terror, of everything. For the fascist to feel safe, all things must be dominated or destroyed.

        How many children would still see their trump voting parents if the parents said openly “I voted for trump because he is going to kill the people I don’t like”? How many who still see that family member now, wouldn’t under those conditions?

        How about last term? How many would have left that person in 2016?

        How many neighbors would live next to a person who openly calls for genocide in the neighborhood?

        The “reasonable doubt” is cover for these hateful, destructive people. It does not confuse them. They know what they are doing.

        • 𝕱𝖎𝖗𝖊𝖜𝖎𝖙𝖈𝖍@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          21 hours ago

          Oh for certain. There’s two cohorts of people here:

          The first is a large subset of the population (around 30% at a guess) who, much like Stephen Miller, are afraid of their own shadows and wish to exterminate anything that casts one. For them, the reasonable doubt is purely a facade. They know they are Nazis, they just won’t admit it publicly (but even that social veil has started to crumble)

          The second cohort is the portion of the population who is largely unaffected by or uninterrested in politics. Here, reasonable doubt is among the tactics employed by the Nazis to make them look away, allowing them to maintain control. For the most part, these are the “both siders” who prefer a false peace through inaction, or the “apoliticals” who don’t understand what machine Pink Floyd and RAtM sing about.

          If you ask me, both groups are idiots. They’re powerful idiots but nevertheless they’re the lowest percentile that humanity has to offer.

      • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        22 hours ago

        They are trying really, really hard to pretend they are happy to do that, but the fact that none of their smiles actually look happy could be considered evidence for a lack of happiness.

    • notSys@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      24 hours ago

      I’m antifascist, I want the death of all Indians (sorry Indians), I want to create a totalitarian regime ruled by complete degenerated person and I’m actively pursuing my goals. If you oppose me, it means you are a fascist.

      Those aren’t my views. I wanted to show that calling yourself antifascist doesn’t mean everyone who is against you is fascist.

          • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            16 hours ago

            But you’re not, and anyone with at least two brain cells can see that.

            Trump calls “Antifa” a terrorist organization. “Antifa” is not an organization at all. It’s a broad term for people who call themselves anti-fascists, and rigidly police each other’s use of that term.

            • notSys@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              16 hours ago

              We are not talking about some abstract antifa, only this single organization.

              You argue that Trump is bad, because he is against organizations, that call themselves antifascist.

              I wanted to show that calling yourself antifascist doesn’t mean that people who are against you are fascist.

      • sbird@sopuli.xyzOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Fascism is the desire for a totalitarian state where (in general) the population must put the state first above everything. Let’s see here:

        I want to create a totalitarian regime ruled by complete degenerated person and I’m actively pursuing my goals.

        Well, that sounds pretty fascist to me. Did you mix the two words up?

          • sbird@sopuli.xyzOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            A/I is not calling for the death of any people group, and they are against racism and bigotry of all forms.

            Yes, giving yourself a label doesn’t necessarily mean it’s correct. North Korea calla itself a Democratic People’s Republic, when in reality it’s closer to a dictatorial monarchy mixed with bits of Marxism. But if we disregarded all labels that could be misused, we would have none at all!

            Also, what the hell man, calling for the death of all Indians as an “example” is not a good look. It doesn’t bode well for whar you actually believe in if you think this is a reasonable example to bring up.

  • NathanRanch@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Any country that uses the dollar is seen by the American government as subordinate to them. They will use that to pursue political goals.

    • sbird@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      It looks like they only accept direct transfer and credit card. They do not accept Bitcoin (or any other cryptocurrency), they have a blog article about why on their donation page if you are interested.

  • quick_snail@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    17 hours ago

    They will be back. This is trivial to fix.

    But if you really want an alternative, disroot is great.

    • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      Functionally equivalent most of the time, especially with some services like email even if your servers are running it doesn’t really matter if neither users nor senders can reach them. Do you remember the IP address of your IMAP server by heart?

      In any case, this is not just a DNS censor, it’s the full hammer of US “terror”-based sanctions. Their bank accounts are being frozen as Italian banks must comply, they can’t get certificates, hosting contracts with most of the world, and so on. It’s bad

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I mean, the fucking way SSL falls over in that case, you can hardly blame anyone.

  • Dæmon S.@catodon.rocks
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    If the domain name gets taken down, (hopefully) there’s still a server listening from an IP address somewhere. In this case, it’s possible to do the following (using the IP address as the domain for the URL, accompanied by a custom Host HTTP header pointing to autistici.org, noblogs.org and subdomains; notice this will require ignoring SSL certificate errors as the A/I certificates don’t contain the IP addresses as valid SANs). This way, A/I can even migrate their hosting to a VPS somewhere unreachable by USA and they don’t even need the Domain name, given, of course, the nginx configuration stays the same (i.e. using the subdomain aliases to point to all the different blogs hosted thereby) as well as the technical requirement from users to inject a custom Host header into a direct IP URL.

    The IP address from the screenshot is both from my dig noblogs.org through my local Brazilian ISP, and also from the status page from kuma.accol.li. If anyone still got working DNS resolutions for Autistici/Inventati servers, write down the IP address (use, for example, dig or even curl to get the IP address for their domains) before said domains stop being solved by the DNS server you use.

    !nostupidquestions@lemmy.world

    Screenshot of my terminal showing a command line in which curl does a request to a URL containing a direct IP address while passing a custom Host HTTP header pointing to autistici.org. curl did manage to connect and receive a valid response from Autistici/Inventati web servers despite autistici.org being unsolvable through DNS servers.

  • Gsus4@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Wtf…they are putting these guys in the same bin as daesh and alqaeda…terrorism means nothing anymore. (probably the actual terrorists feel insulted)

    • Mrkawfee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Since the UK regime designated Palestine Action a terror group the average arrested terrorist is now a 60 year old white woman.

      The amount of repression going on is insane

    • 456456@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s been like that since the start of the war on terror. The US can label anyone (including US citizens) they want as a terrorist and kill them and their family despite no due process.

    • Courtney (she/her/they) @lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s honestly deligitimizing the word terrorism.

      It’s like the “war on drugs”. The DARE program (an anti-drug program cops run in schools) was the single best promoter of drugs I’ve ever seen. When they tell people all drugs will kill you and thc is just as bad as heroin, when you try a joint or vape for the first time and don’t get immediately addicted or die, you think “well I guess heroin and crack can’t be that bad either”

      If you call everything that’s against fascism, bigotry, and hate a “terrorist group” it really makes all the legitimate terrorism extremist groups look much tamer, and less people will think of them as terrorists.

        • You don’t have self-control when you start using them.

          When you’ve seen an otherwise rational, smart adult ruin their entire family and steal from their own children in order to get a fix after “just trying it once”, you understand all the self control in the world won’t be enough.

        • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 hours ago

          You imagine. You sound like someone who’s either A), never struggled with addiction; or B), is currently struggling with addiction and just hasn’t realized it yet.

          “It’s won’t be that bad if I have self-control” is a lie that many addicts told themselves in the beginning. You hear people mention it all the time at recovery groups.

          The problem is that tiny little “if” is pulling several times more than its own weight in that sentence.

          • freely1333@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            19 hours ago

            I sound more like the people who say if you want to lose weight you need to eat less. Which while true some people do not have the ability to follow through on. Of course I’ve never done heroin or crack - but I wager the people willing to do heroin or crack are the kind of people most likely to get addicted to it.

            Addiction is super fucked up but it’s not some sort of alien body snatcher that makes you have zero control of your actions.

            • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 hours ago

              What point is your analogy even trying to make? “If you want to be healthy and still do crack or heroin, you just need to do less crack or heroin”? Dude, you sound batshit. Is this ragebait?

              Which while true some people do not have the ability to follow through on.

              No, it’s not even true. Some people have medical and/or genetic conditions that make losing wait nearly impossible even if they eat absolutely healthy, in moderate amounts, and exercise regularly. And unless you’re a medical doctor I suggest you shut the fuck up and stop being so smug while spreading outright falsehoods as if they were fact.

              but I wager the people willing to do heroin or crack are the kind of people most likely to get addicted to it.

              No, many of them are the type of people who get a back injury at work and are prescribed too many painkillers (often by doctors who receive financial kickbacks from pharmaceutical companies who manufacture opioids), only to get addicted to these highly physiologically addictive substances, so that when the prescription runs out they experience withdrawal symptoms which are literally torturous to endure unless they can find a fix on the streets, where heroin and fentanyl are easier to come by (and cheaper) than Vicodin or Percocets.

              Addiction is super fucked up but it’s not some sort of alien body snatcher that makes you have zero control of your actions.

              This whole sentence is fucked, and it just goes to show you have no personal experience in the matter and no clue what you’re fucking talking about. And if there’s anyone in your life who’s struggling with addiction, I feel sincerely sorry for them that (in addition to the living hell they’re already going through every single day) they have to deal with you, your judgement, and your dismissiveness.

              Robbing people of their willpower is literally what addiction does. It’s what addiction is. If a person still has all their willpower intact, then they’re not an addict.

              And you’re basically backseat driving or quarterbacking from the couch by saying “Just don’t get addicted! Just do less!” Like, shut the fuck up. You don’t understand addiction at all, and nobody who struggles with it every day of their life needs to listen to advice from you who have no clue what it’s like to life with.

              • freely1333@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 hours ago

                Which is why I related it to the food thing. I’ve been physically addicted to very strong opiates after surgery in the hey day of “here everyone take the opiates” medicine. It certainly didn’t make me want more opiates, even if it was some of the most miserable days of my life.

                I mean I’m addicted to nicotine but if it was made highly illegal I wouldn’t start shooting up fentanyl laced nic just to get my fix…

                • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 hours ago

                  I mean I’m addicted to nicotine

                  “Just smoke less. It’ll reduce your risk for cancer. You just need some self-control.”

                  That’s what you sound like.