• Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    19 hours ago

    If you live outside of dense urban areas, there are usually NO sidewalks for pedestrians. Intersections often lack crosswalks, and the timing of traffic lights don’t actually give people enough time to even cross the street. On top of that, with the advent of cell phones, people are more distracted while they are driving than ever before.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    Correlate that with truck size.

    Edit: can’t find a “size” chart, google and the rest are force feeding me “market share” as a size, not GVW or height. Height of hood could probably be part of the reason for increase in deaths, both driver visibility issues and more likely to cause head injury. However, a generic weight chart shows trucks growing in size more rapidly and overall weiging more than cars for quite a while.

    Correlation != causation, but yeah. Might be a thing.

    • Eric@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 hours ago

      It’s even scarier because I’ve seen fewer and fewer people outside walking over the years. I’d imagine that it’s more dangerous than it seems.

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      I imagine it’s just one more contributing factor as well as significant phone use while driving, awful infrastructure, near non-existent requirements to get behind the wheel, and just generally terrible driving culture.

      I got my first speeding ticket ever this year (whoops…) and elected to do traffic school. It was all online, like $10, and you just keep taking the test until you pass. It’s just a stupid formality that teaches no one anything.

  • moonshadow@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Feel like this will not be a popular take here, but hear me out: I blame safety regs. Crash test standards ensconce drivers deep within a dense cage of beefy reinforced pillars and crumple zones, while “driver assists” make them complacent and disengaged. Modern people movers have worse visibility than an old farm truck and massive touchscreens you have to use to operate the windshield wipers. Peak car was like a quarter century ago, bring back the 1994 Honda Civic. The hatch specifically, that thing was dope. At least you’d notice if you hit someone in one of those

    • Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      You do know that all the other countries have the same issues you just mentioned, and there, the numbers are going down rather than up.

      Edit: I guess they’ve been going up in Europe after COVID as well.

      • moonshadow@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        I would attribute that delay at least in part to the “cash for clunkers” program, which took older vehicles off the road en masse in 2009 in the US specifically. Made number go up but life a little worse, like most things we do :(

        e: in case the correlation isn’t clear (or you just don’t feel like clicking), the program offered government subsidized and highly inflated trade in values for vehicles over a certain age and under a certain fuel economy. This greatly benefited auto manufacturers and investors at the direct expense of taxpayers and used car buyers by using government funding to essentially purchase and destroy ~half of the used car market at the time, depending who you ask.

  • jaykrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Terrible infrastructure decisions combined with massive tank sized vehicles going 40 mph down side streets while many are stressed out working 2 jobs looking down at their smart phone to see if they’re going to be late. Surprised?

    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      19 hours ago

      And company policies that consider 1 minute late to be penalty-worthy. And long vast stretches of straight road. (“Design roads like barrels and people will drive like bullets.”)

      Longer and longer commutes…

      Unpredictable jams and construction…

      It’s all fundamentally designed in opposition to human well-being.

      • jaykrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I still remember when a coworker a while back came to work the first time an hour late because their alarm didn’t go off in the morning and they were freaking out. One of the reasons I left. I seriously hate that culture entirely.

    • chippydingo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I used to be one of those as well. Moved to WV and it added a new element of fun…icy roads. Three years of that and sadly I became an ex-owner of a Miata since I couldn’t really winter the car and I had a motivated buyer. I miss that car most days but you really have to be on your toes all the time with the tractor trailers and “yank tanks” as they lovingly refer to them across the pond.

      Subes are boring but effective in this part of the country.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    There are still too many people who forgot how to drive during pandemic.

    For example, just the other day my dog was almost murdered because some idiot came zooming around the bend and “stopped” well past the crosswalk we were in. At an all-way stop sign. With cars already stopped.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    21 hours ago

    “I don’t care! I need bigger pickup truck regardless of the cost to society. Make 'em bigger, boys!! Fuck standards and fuck regulations! Human life is cheap anyways.”.

  • x0x7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    19 hours ago

    But why increasing over the prior period? I have a theory you’re not going to like.

    Demands for safer (for vehicle occupants), and more aerodynamic profiles, lead to giant angled framing in the cabin that sits exactly in the worst place to create a blind spot for pedestrians.

    If it’s going to increase you have to blame something that changed.

  • grepe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    i mean, those plebs pedestrians and kids just walking around are basically asking for it /s

      • HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        That’s more or less the sales pitch for bigger and bigger vehicles; “Protect your family from big vehicles by buying a bigger vehicle today!”

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      2 days ago

      They should not be legally classified as a car. That should require a special license to drive. That thing is like a freaking wheel loader.

      • Jiral@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Here comes the fun part. They are legally not classified as a car, at least not in the US. That’s the whole point and the reason, why they are allowed to be much deadlier for everyone else, unsafer also for those inside and more polluting.

          • Player2@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            25
            ·
            1 day ago

            Oh no, normal license is fine. It just means it doesn’t need to meet the same safety or emissions regulations, and also has a lower tax rate. Because it can be used for work you see

            • Victor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              1 day ago

              Bro that’s fucked up. That is… not right. This type of heavy vehicle would require a special license in my country.

              • Someone8765210932@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                20 hours ago

                If you’re interested about this, here is a video from Climate Town about this topic. He mentions it less than two minutes in: SUV’s are regulated as “non passanger work vehicles” and don’t have to hit the same standards as regular cars and manufacturers can make much more money selling them.

                Of course this is absolutly insane. How does it make sense that 40+% of all vehicles on the road in the US are “non passanger work vehicles”.

                • AA5B@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  17 hours ago

                  I mean cause and effect is the other way around. Non-passenger work vehicles were mostly work vehicles until they started being regulated differently. Those regulations were clearly a problem long before they created the current situation

                  Massachusetts was one of the holdouts: not that they could regulate the vehicles but I still remember when they required a commercial license

            • Snapz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 day ago

              Yes work… Buying a single 2x4 at home depot and putting a blanket down so it doesn’t scratch your bed

      • CSC@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Agree with you. These should be considered as heavy vehicles (sorry if I’m wrong. English is not my native language). The number of these accidents that happen in the US is insane.

  • Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    Well according to the numbers its clear that instead of dying overseas they are coming to the US to get run over /s

    It’s insane how terrible our oversized suvs and trucks have gotten. There is a 12 foot blind spot in front of many of them now where you can’t see someone sitting down or a small child.

    Absolutely insanity.

    • ramble81@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      It really does blow my mind, if you look at graph after graph of the US compared to the world, so much of the world is in line and the US is a constant outlier and yet people venimently state how good things are and “it’s just because the US is so big”, which is a complete fallacy.

      • redballooon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Don’t forget that it was in part religious people who left Europe, because Europe was not religious enough for them, in the 18th and 19th century.

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 days ago

    Not only have the vehicles gotten bigger, but the conservatives have purposely pushed vehicular homicide as something that is acceptable for groups like protesters. Just mention a “liberal” blocking the road to any conservative to have them quickly quip that they would run them over.

    Normalizing vehicular homicide is totally a reflection of our safe and sane car culture in the US.