PugJesus@lemmy.world to NonCredibleDefense@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months ago5th generation warfarelemmy.worldimagemessage-square7fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1image5th generation warfarelemmy.worldPugJesus@lemmy.world to NonCredibleDefense@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agomessage-square7fedilink
minus-square🐑🇸 🇭 🇪 🇪 🇵 🇱 🇪🐑@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·9 months agoAs a German, this word was compounded incorrectly anyway. Adjectives don’t get compounded. So it would be “Beweglicher Torpfostenkrieg”
minus-squareTurun@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-29 months agoThis is wrong. That would describe a certain type of war, but specify that the war is movable. I think the “Torpfostverschiebekrieg” mentioned in another comment would be the best solution.
minus-squarecircuscritic@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·9 months agoLook guys, I found the Grammer Nazi.
minus-squareSubArcticTundra@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·9 months agoBut surely wouldn’t that imply the existence of such thing as a ‘goal post war’? Because the term is meant to mean ‘(moving goal post) (war)’, and not ‘(moving) (goal post war)’
minus-squareFleetingTit@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·9 months agoBeweglicher-Torpfosten-Krieg looks about right.
minus-squareChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-22 months agodeleted by creator
As a German, this word was compounded incorrectly anyway. Adjectives don’t get compounded. So it would be “Beweglicher Torpfostenkrieg”
This is wrong. That would describe a certain type of war, but specify that the war is movable.
I think the “Torpfostverschiebekrieg” mentioned in another comment would be the best solution.
Look guys, I found the Grammer Nazi.
But surely wouldn’t that imply the existence of such thing as a ‘goal post war’? Because the term is meant to mean ‘(moving goal post) (war)’, and not ‘(moving) (goal post war)’
Beweglicher-Torpfosten-Krieg looks about right.
deleted by creator