• zbyte64@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      That would be dumb. Taiwan is a better asset if they have an independent government that’s on the same page geopolitically. Australia bucked the USA’s geopolitical agenda, and they got couped.

      • exanime@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        That would be dumb. Taiwan is a better asset if they have an independent government that’s on the same page geopolitically

        Which is why the US wants to “defend democracy” there, that is clearly what I mean… they want a Taiwan that is subservient to the USA, not an independent Taiwan that would actually be independent

        Australia bucked the USA’s geopolitical agenda

        I don’t understand what “bucked” means in this context

        • zbyte64@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          In this context the Australian people voted for an administration that would no longer “co-operate” with the USA’s geopolitical aims, they “bucked”/rejected the agenda. The USA responded by pressing those in power to create a constitutional crisis and replace the administration.

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1975_Australian_constitutional_crisis

          I guess my point is that America doesn’t engage in the same tactics as China does in regards to Taiwan, or that hemisphere, probably because of distance. The USA favors regime change over making a new colony.

      • exanime@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        no, you are right… track record shows USA is interested in defending other countries for the sake of freedom, liberties and the American way… not at all for self interest

        • andrewth09@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          No country takes action based on moral grounds. They only take action for their self interest. This is international relations 101. Sometimes these align! Sometimes… not so much.

          What Taiwan has done is made the “good” outcome (Taiwan remains free and independent) align with the US’s self interest (having computers and a tech based economy).

          The US will always exert power over Taiwan, so will China. That’s just what great powers do. However, China doesn’t need to threaten an invasion to do this. There is no reason China can’t relinquish their claim on Taiwan and just build a casual trade relationship with Taiwan.

          • exanime@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            However, China doesn’t need to threaten an invasion to do this. There is no reason China can’t relinquish their claim on Taiwan and just build a casual trade relationship with Taiwan.

            Not justifying China’s methods or intentions at all, but you know what you are claiming is impossible

            The USA can (and has before) forbidden third parties to run businesses with other countries… As they have already done to China itself.

            It would be completely naive for China to assume they won’t be cut off from the very valuable industry Taiwan has once the USA establishes itself as the sole/mayority buyer

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Nobody said it wasn’t for self interest, it’s just nothing like the situation between Taiwan and China at all. Like not even close. I think you need to inform yourself on some regional history.