The former National Enquirerâs secret agreement with Donald Trump is shocking, even by the sensational standards of his former publication.
Former National Enquirer publisher David Peckerâs testimony in Donald Trumpâs hush money trial this week revealed the underhanded tactics his publication used to defend the former president, flagrantly violating not only mainstream journalism ethics rules, but even the more lurid standards typical of tabloids like his.
âI knew the National Enquirer was slimy, but I didnât know they were this slimy,â said Kelly McBride, the senior vice president and chair of the Craig Newmark Center for Ethics and Leadership at the non-profit Poynter Institute. âIt is so far outside the practice of journalism that itâs hard for me to even imagine that this was happening.â
In testimony this week during Trumpâs trial in New York City, the former CEO of National Enquirerâs former parent company explained in stunning detail how he agreed to act as âeyes and earsâ for Trumpâs campaign, purchasing the rights to stories in order to suppress them, and even outright fabricating negative stories about Trumpâs opponents.
âI wanted to protect my company, I wanted to protect myself, and I also wanted to protect Donald Trump,â Pecker said about why he released a false public statement about his publicationâs âcatch and killâ agreement to purchase and bury Karen McDougalâs story about her alleged monthslong affair with Trump
If someone is reading the National Enquirer and thinks itâs actual news, they are already an idiot and nothing revealed in this trial is going to smarten them up.
In the 80s, the National Enquirer had a âseanceâ to ask the ghost of Marilyn Monroe if someone had murdered her and who the murderer was. They then reported this as if it wad an actual source and named Bobby Kennedy the killer. Itâs not like this is a real news source in any way, and it never has been.
Thatâs not the issue. The issue is that they were buying peoplesâ silence.