• WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I feel like this is just the next level of what Reagan did to cripple the government. You make it so they can’t do their job effectively then use the fact that it’s not efficient anymore as the reason to get rid of it all.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Nah, it’s way worse. It will add a thick layer of corruption to the government and we would basically become like Russia. You will need to grease hands to get anything done, bad or good.

      • WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Definitely agree that it would be way worse, that’s why I said it would be the next level of what Reagan was doing. It’s down the same track but taking it to an even worse level.

    • TipRing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      It definitely started with Reagan.

      While he didn’t originate the expression he did go on TV to quip “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’”

      Which is such a deeply stupid thing to say, but it perfectly characterized Reagan’s animosity towards the bureaucracy that makes our country function. He did immense damage to that bureaucracy in his tenure, politicizing department heads that had previously been professionals, crippling useful programs like welfare and greenlighting wasteful ones like Star Wars. Conservatives are eager to make the government as ineffective as they claim it to be.

      Project 2025 will be this and so much worse, but this trend really took off with Reagan.

      Just add it to the pile of reasons why that man’s grave should be spit upon.