• Veneroso@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Man I can’t wait to get charged with adultery when the court finds out how much porn I watch.

    • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      If you live in the United States, depending on the state, you might get your wish.

    • Candelestine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s not good enough to simply say you’re a conscientious objector, otherwise everyone and their brother would do it and conscription as a concept would fail.

      So, if you are one, you gotta fucking prove that shit somehow. Words aren’t good enough. Go protest, join an org, donate to charities, whatever. Need some evidence though.

      It’s not complicated to understand.

          • SLaSZT@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            Testimony is evidence, that’s how court works. This is the reason why you swear an oath of honesty under penalty of perjury.

            • Woht24@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              No mate.

              Testimony of what you witnessed, did first hand or was told first hand is evidence.

              ‘I value human life over video games’ is a statement or opinion on your thoughts/intent.

              That is not evidence.

      • Thief_of_Crows@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Saying it is good enough. It’s not unreasonable to think a regular person might be against human rights abuses. You can’t demand that citizens go support your imperialist regime just because they only indirectly show support for human life.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    but a lower court dismissed this partially because he loves playing PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds. (emphasis mine)

    I suspect that “partially” is working harder than John Henry in this sentance.