Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful youā€™ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutā€™nā€™paste it into its own post ā€” thereā€™s no quota for posting and the bar really isnā€™t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many ā€œesotericā€ right wing freaks, but thereā€™s no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iā€™m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged ā€œculture criticsā€ who write about everything but understand nothing. Iā€™m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyā€™re inescapable at this point, yet I donā€™t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnā€™t be surgeons because they didnā€™t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canā€™t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

Last weekā€™s thread

(Semi-obligatory thanks to @dgerard for starting this)

  • BigMuffin69@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    Ā·
    21 days ago

    After he started rambling about his Mathematical Universe Hypothesis, it was obvious his brain was cooked.

    As humanity gets closer to Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)

    Arrow of time and all that, innit? And God help me, I actually read part of the post as well as the discussion comments where the prompt fondlers were lamenting that all it takes is one rogue ai code to end the world because it will ā€œoptimize against you!ā€ I assume Evil GPT is constructing anti matter bombs using ingredients it finds under the kitchen sink.

    • blakestacey@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      Ā·
      21 days ago

      This is just straight-up gossip, but why not:

      Tegmark used to go around polling physicists at conferences about which interpretation of quantum mechanics they prefer. A colleague of mine said that they were sitting near Tegmark and saw him fudging the numbers in his notes ā€” erasing the non-Many Worlds tallies from those who said they supported Many Worlds as well as others, IIRC.

    • sc_griffith@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      Ā·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      I remember he went on julia galefā€™s podcast to talk about the MUH and she was like ā€œbut what does that meanā€ and simple questions like that and he flailed, it was painful to hear