• BluesF@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    12 days ago

    Oh yeah, I’m talking about calling the LLM with code, not using the LLM to help write the code. They still suck at providing anything reliant on factual accuracy. What they are very good at is extracting meaning from text, e.g. taking a user’s natural language request and deciding what to do with it from a set of options.

    • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      Sure. I believe that’s called “intent classification” and has been around in natural language processing for quite some time.