• Stern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    For a second I thought they were referring to the full page advert in the Times he took out when the issue was happening in the 90s (and never apologized for after they were acquitted) and was like, “Isn’t there a statute of limitations?”, but to think he’d double down decades later? hahaha oh wow

    • yesman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      12 days ago

      I lost a lot of faith in Burns after he heavily featured some lost-cause dilettante in his Civil War series. After I saw him pictured on one of the retreats that Clarence Thomas was bribed with, I plain don’t trust his judgement about American History.