• Flumsy@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Thats still very much generalizing. What this meme essentially says is that if you’re a capitalist, you’re not part of Lemmy.

        On a seperate note, you cant possibly know how many people on Lemmy actually support capitalism or not. It has a left tendency, yes, but I bet the majority of Lemmx users do support caputalidm in some shape or form.

        • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Does anyone here own capital? As in being haut bourgeoisie? Probably not.

          If you support capitalism and you’re not a capitalist you’re just a bootlicker.

          • MashBoilPitch@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            And you live on your own self-sustaining compound, posting from your open hardware, fabricated in free factories, Libre software OS and applications, with compost-generated power? Didn’t think so. Welcome to the gray zone bootlicker.

    • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Does anyone here own capital? As in being haut bourgeoisie? Probably not.

      If you support capitalism and you’re not a capitalist you’re just a bootlicker.

        • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Okay, that at most makes you petite bourgeoisie not haut bourgeoisie. But I’m guessing you can’t live off of your passive income so you’re still proletariat. You have more in common with the proletariat than not, and you have more to gain by overthrowing capitalism then preserving it.

            • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Yes, the goal posts of definitions created by a guy who has been dead for more than 100 years. Clarifying a misunderstanding on a basic concept of Marxist analysis of capitalism written more than 100 years ago is moving the goalposts.

              Also, can you live entirely off your passive income? If not, youre not even petite bourgeoisie.

      • huge_clock@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        You wouldn’t be any better off on a socialist system. The people at the top of the party would control everything and the working class would be even poorer than they are now. You’re just licking the left boot instead of the right one.

        • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          This is empirically untrue, but also just nonsense. Politicians do not have the same class relationship as capitalists with the proletariat.

          • huge_clock@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Oh I’m sorry i didn’t realize there was empirical evidence for socialism. Please send me a link to some of these successful socialist societies.

            • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Cuba, Vietnam, and Laos for starters China went from a century of humiliation to a superpower in less then a century thanks to socialism. The USSR was better than the feudalism before it or the dictatorships of the bourgeoisie that came after it by a wide margin. For a place much poorer than the US, they had similar nutrition, better education, more rights for women both legalistically and practically.

              Oh, throw in east Germany too. Do you know what the Stasi did to the lgbt movement that they saw as subversive? Destroy it by ending discrimination against gay and trans people, including a massive education campaign to eradicate homophobia and transphobia and state funded gay bars. Compare that to how the US was treating gay people at the time.

          • MashBoilPitch@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Dang, for a moment I considered that you might have independent thoughts. This LemmtGradChatGPT BS ruined it.