DylanMc6 [any, any]

Yo, my name is Dylan but you can call me DIlly.

As seen on Hexbear.

I’m still non-binary.

Seriously!

  • 8 Posts
  • 119 Comments
Joined 3 days ago
cake
Cake day: December 3rd, 2025

help-circle


  • DylanMc6 [any, any]@lemmy.mlOPtoSocialism@lemmy.mlhello again
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    okay, i just had to do that leftvalues quiz again, i’ll talk about what i think about the questions you listed (in no fixed order):

    Q: ‘Local planners, rather than national planners, are more efficient at running a planned economy.’

    A: i prefer national planners - neutral/unsure.

    Q: ‘It is acceptable for humanity to suffer to some notable extent in order to preserve the natural ecosystem.’

    A: maybe, maybe not - for the most part, we should work together to help our environment - neutral/unsure.

    Q: ‘Society is chiefly driven by individuals and ideas.’

    A: fascism is NOT even an idea, but a very violent individualist ideology that resulted in the mass murder of millions of people in the Holocaust, one of the most tragic events that has ever happened in history. that said, society is actually driven by collective work - neutral/unsure.

    Q: ‘The negative consequences of a revolution generally outweigh the advantages.’

    A: after the october revolution, russia did recover under socialism and such - neutral/unsure.

    Q: ‘Any socialist country should be dedicated to exporting their ideology abroad.’

    A: amen to that - strongly agree.

    Q: ‘Industrialized farming practices must be abolished even if it leads to lower outputs.’

    A: farming is an important part of a socialist society, as long as it’s NOT industrialized completely - neutral/unsure.

    Q: ‘A highly centralized planned economy is not socialism but rather state capitalism.’

    A: some people considered china and vietnam among other socialist/communist countries to be ‘state capitalist’, me included. i think china’s economy is technically state capitalist because much of the economy goes to the state through state-owned enterprise - agree.

    Q: ‘Bureaucracy and inefficiency are always inherent in centrally planned economies.’

    A: maybe a participatory economic system, perhaps? agree.

    Q: ‘Socialist organizations are generally better off when organized loosely and decentrally.’

    A: some should be decentralized, some should not - agree.

    Q: ‘A centrally planned economy based around computers is a concept worth investigating.’

    A: chile’s cybersyn comes to mind - strongly agree.

    Q: Marriage is a patriarchal social construct that should be phased out.

    A: marry who you want, as long as you’re both consenting adults - neutral/unsure.

    Q: Prisons are oppressive and antiquated institutions that need to be abolished.

    A: prisons should be for rehabiliative justice - neutral/unsure.

    Q: Measures to address environmental issues are unacceptable if they result in significant decreases in production and quality of life.

    A: no comment - neutral/unsure.

    Q: Some small scale destruction of nature is acceptable if it notably benefits humanity.

    A: no comment - neutral/unsure.


    still got “centrist marxism”.

    revolution vs. reform: very conflicted - i think socialism starts at the ballot, but if NOT the ballot, then we all must reluctantly use force.

    scientific or utopian?: sort of a cross.

    central or decentral: who cares if it’s decentralized or NOT? everyone should have their own say in a socialist government.

    international or national: international revolutions are the way to go.

    party or union?: both!

    production or nature: protecting our environment should be an essential step to a socialist country.

    conservative or progressive: progressive. seriously!


    1. i said that i deserved to be called a fencesitter for what i said, so i’ll give you that one.
    2. again, i strongly disagree with charlie kirk - being someone who’s non-binary, NO ONE should ever call for people losing their human rights simply because of who they are. seriously!
    3. i was on hexbear, but i got banned because i said stuff that they disagree with - i’m still learning. i agree with the idea of socialism, and i’m looking for resources from across the socialist spectrum (including marxism-leninism). if you have any resources on this, please let me know.



  • or pop an M&M candy for charlie kirk if you’re sober

    in all seriousness, i have nothing to say about charlie kirk’s death - if i say that charlie kirk deserved it, i’d get comments defending him; if i say that charlie kirk DIDN’T, i’d get comments from people saying otherwise. addressing charlie kirk’s death is like an ethical quandary to me, that’s why i prefer NOT to say anything about that. i neither condemn nor endorse his assassination in any way, and i deserved to be called a fencesitter just for saying this.

    i do have to say when i watched charlie kirk’s death video (and DON’T worry it was blurred - i’m pretty sure i saw it on the new york post), and when i heard the gunshot sound, i said “oh god!” - that’s how i reacted. again, the actual assassination was blurred (luckily, so i DON’T have to see it uncensored). oh and i strongly disagree with charlie kirk - a very polarizing figure, i’d say.

    in other words, i oppose charlie kirk, but i prefer to avoid defending or condemning his death. malcolm x should be celebrated a bit more than charlie kirk though - rip malcolm x (1925-1965). seriously!