

found that it did
How so?
Every one commits treason who, in Canada,
- uses force or violence for the purpose of overthrowing the government of Canada or a province;
Not so far…
- without lawful authority, communicates or makes available to an agent of a state other than Canada, military or scientific information or any sketch, plan, model, article, note or document of a military or scientific character that he knows or ought to know may be used by that state for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or defence of Canada;
Maybe? I don’t see military or scientific secrets being described here, but I’m open to the possiblity if there’s any evidence.
- conspires with any person to commit high treason or to do anything mentioned in paragraph (a);
Again, not so far.
- forms an intention to do anything that is high treason or that is mentioned in paragraph (a) and manifests that intention by an overt act; or
Again, not so far.
- conspires with any person to do anything mentioned in paragraph (b) or forms an intention to do anything mentioned in paragraph (b) and manifests that intention by an overt act.
And that’s another maybe, but I don’t see anything in this article that screams “military or scientific secrets.”



















Yeah, I omitted High Treason, because it obviously doesn’t apply.
And the laws sound treason are pretty much entirely focused on facilitating a foreign military invasion. Based on what we know so far, I don’t think there’s anything there that would hold up in court.
But like I said the last time this came up, by all means, investigate away. I just think it’s far more likely that they’d get nailed on lesser charges like foreign interference-related stuff (but I don’t really know anything about our foreign interference laws, save that they seem to be woefully inadequate).