naahhhhh… (i play 2D games)

loser city up in here

i guess that the point i’m trying to make is that communism doesn’t mean central management. in fact, my personal definition of communism, in my mind, or at least to my understanding, contradicts highly authoritarian, centralized, or totalitarian government. you can’t have a classless, stateless society and also a CEO/dictator/president supported by an upper-caste/class of first-class citizens/oligarchs. what i disagree with you on is your conflation of communism with authoritarianism, something i’ve seen both pro- and anti-communists do

don’t let tankies re-define the real meaning of communism, which is worker control, not central control

The article was about Windows. And, no, I’m not on Windows. i use GrapheneOS on my phone and triple-boot Arch/Debian/Fedora on my laptop. I’m just making the point that the article was about Windows so replying with UNIX commands doesn’t really make sense.

Yeah and it wasn’t a super clear death threat. Definitely rude but I think terrorism is a clearly excessive charge. I don’t think it’s right to target individuals, especially lower level ones when it’s the corporate “entity” as a whole, especially the higher-ups at fault.

for Windows?

For people who are beginners when it comes to computers in general, yeah. But for people who are new to GNU/Linux but experienced with CS/math, it’ll really not be that hard to run archinstall and configure from there. It’s not that different than many other distros, which also have an installer and then post-install configuration to contend with. I’d just argue arch has newer packages and better documentation which some beginners (in the sense they’re coming from macOS/Windows but know how basic software concepts) might appreciate.

I don’t think archinstall is drowning sysadmins/programmers/CS students. What it will do is teach them to swim.

I think they may have said that because the state of Florida sought terrorism charges when a lady told a healthcare member they’d be next after the Luigi thing.

That wouldn’t fall under the purview of hate-crime law I.M.O (disclaimer: I’m not a lawyer) because neither the intended nor the actual target was targeted on the basis of an identity category (ethnicity, gender, creed, race, religion, nationality). Not unless you include occupation as an identity. I don’t.

To be clear, I don’t recommend it. But it was once favored over KVM for a variety of applications and it works in a fundamentally different way. I’m just surprised how quickly it’s lost favor among techies.

Not every implementation. Maybe every state implementation (widely recognized states tend to be at least somewhat authoritarian, and the existence of a state isn’t compatible with the ultimate goal of a state-less, class-less, & money-less society). But there are some not-as-recognized examples of somewhat successful, somewhat decentralized leftist organizations. (They tend to be in a constant state of war with surrounding right-wing death squads, though.)

• EZLN
• PKK
• PLFP

To be clear, it makes sense that it’s easier to handle disagreements within an army or party without resorting to outright authoritarianism; people who disagree enough to lead to real conflict are more likely to join a different army/front/party than create chaos inside of it. Still, there might be one last example of a pseudo-state or pseudo-country that seems consistent with anti-authoritarian leftist values:

• (Revolutionary Catalonia)[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolutionary_Catalonia]

There was a variety of leftist political activity in the region and no clear leader or authority, at least not in a definite singular sense. Unfortunately, the right-wing nationalist death squad got to them after only about a year. I wish that someone had intervened in nationalist Spain the way there’d been de-Nazi-fication in nationalist Germany.

I think that’s loosely true of the party in general, especially the higher-ups. But it’s worth pointing out that at least some people within the party, e.g., Ilhan Omar, who differ from the mainstream and who are genuine leftists.

it’s a good beginner distro because getting thrown into deep water is how one learns to swim. archinstall makes it easy enough to install. some configuration may be needed, but that’s the point of Arch as a learning process! still, i’d recommend Fedora, Tumbleweed, or even Debian (it’s out of date but some people prefer UIs that don’t change very often and it still offers 32-bit for your grandpa and his old laptop that’s now too slow for Windows 10/11) over Arch.

Arch is good for beginner sysadmins/programmers/CS students. Fedora and Tumbleweed for enthusiasts who want the latest software but aren’t trying to be that hardcore. Debian for people who have old laptops and only want to learn GNOME/XFCE once and never have to re-learn it with every update.

Gentoo is a good example of a distro that’s absolutely not for beginners. Arch, on the other hand, really isn’t all that bad.

I think hate crime would be the most appropriate charge.

I be zipping up the directory and uploading my save files to the internet

A useful distraction to prevent class warfare and protect their wealth with a convenient and reliable scapegoat designed to ensure a divided working class.

Surprised no one is saying Xen

I feel like the big question is who is doing the planning? Because if it’s the central government, not workers themselves, we’re fucked. Communism is bottom-up, not top down. There can be organizers and public servants but there cannot be executives.

Communism doesn’t mean a state-planned economy. There is no state under true communism.

Single ownership is centralized communism. Decentralized and multi-centralized communism exists. Correct me if this is a misunderstanding.