• Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 months ago

    Well there’s a metro they’ve been building for 25 years. They’ve competed just under half of 1 line, with 14 stations operational.

    And that’s it.

    Part of the issue is property acquisition. A bunch of neighborhoods have ill defined property lines and owners (its not uncommon for an allyway to be annexed by someone putting down tile and a gate at either end. Then Google maps routes you through someone’s home and they shoo you out while brandishing a cleaver).

    It gives Kawloon Walled City sometimes.

    • jackmaoist [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah so it’s the Bangalore route. Metro is the best form of public transportation and should be priority because buses will always get stuck in traffic. Don’t see any reason to provide free bus tickets when they’re already very cheap.

        • jackmaoist [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          280M is a lot of money that can be used to build out better public transport which will work forever. I always take the metro over buses due to a multitude of reasons.

          Buses are already cheap to operate hence the cheap fare. They don’t have to be profitable but instead they should charge fares at least from people who can afford paying them. Otherwise this will just paralyse the long term development of other more efficient solutions. I’ve seen it happen in Bangalore where traffic has completely overwhelmed roads and the commute sucks major ass because of underdeveloped metro systems. Delhi is so much better because you can catch a metro from almost anywhere.