• Rioting Pacifist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Does this mean it could come back with a smaller budget? I actually think that could be good, but don’t fully understand the BBC jargon.

    • ValueSubtracted@startrek.websiteOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think it’s practically a necessity at this point. I’m not in the camp of “Doctor Who should have a shoestring budget,” but it could probably contract to at least the equivalent of what it was during the Chibnall era.

      • SiliconAvatar@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        To be fair, the Chibnall run looked really good to me. I don’t want to stir the “Chibnall bad” pot, but the visual effects were absolutely top notch for a BBC produced show. Same with all of Moffat’s seasons.

        What they can afford now vs then is a completely different matter, but the fact that they’re looking to do a solicitation round for external production companies might be telling. AFAICT the BBC’s charter is up for renewal next year, and that may determine their finances going forward?

        • ValueSubtracted@startrek.websiteOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          the visual effects were absolutely top notch for a BBC produced show.

          No disagreement here - I’d be quite happy to return to that.